P-51D drop tank plumbing (1 Viewer)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

von hahn

Airman 1st Class
137
20
Aug 2, 2008
JNB
Hi. I know that both the 108gal and 75gal drop tanks used on P-51Ds had a few pipes attached between the drop tank and the wing, but my question is did the pipes detach from the wing with the drop tank when the drop tank was jettisoned or did these pipes, or part thereof, remain attached to the wing after the drop tank fell away?

I've seen original photos that seem to suggest that part of the plumbing stayed behind (a photo of the 356th FG P-51D "Jackie" for example).

Thanks in advance!
 
As far as I recall, there were external break-away fittings between the wing and tank which meant that part of the fuel and pressure lines stayed sticking out of the wing after the tank separated. I could dig some more but am limited for time right now.
 
They used glass tubes for breakaway. But the tanks also required tubing to provide air ressure to the tanks, using the vaccum pump exhaust. So it required at least two tubes. Some photos appear to show three. From the book "Mustang at War" by Roger A. Freeman, 1974.

P-51DropTanks-2.jpg
 
The below picture, taken from Britmodeller, shows the remaining lines after jettison. Just ahead of the rack, you can see the fuel line and, inboard of the rack and between the two stabilizers, you can see the pressure line. This line was sometimes located in front of the rack in line with, and just aft of, the fuel line

oNChKRT.jpg
 
I have some detail shots, and I think a drawing, of the "plumbing" arrangement, But I'm having problems up-loading pics at the moment ( not just to the forum), when my PC "freezes" and I have to re-start to get anything to work.
EDIT:- Managed to load one pic, of a restored (static) P-51D at Duxford, just after completion, and before being moved to the American Museum for display.
This shows the 75 gal tank, with the rubber hoses and, at the tank-end of these, the glass "break away" tubes ( one of which appears to be copper here, probably "good enough" for a static, ceiling-hanging display, as it now is ).
The 108 gal steel, and "paper" tanks, had a similar arrangement, although one of the pipes ( from memory, the pressure line) ran towards the rear of the tank, on the portside on each tank, roughly just aft, and slightly outboard of the rear of the pylon.



DSC_0164.JPG
 
Yep, I believe it depended on the source of the tank. From memory, fuel was the forward pipe, and pressure the aft pipe - I'd need to find the drawings to verify this.
 
Truly some exceptionally helpful info you guys have provided. Thank you for the time and effort you put into helping me answer this question.
 
This may help more. Note no mention of glass tubes. There is a mention of breakaway fittings but I would expect those to be a metal tube inserted into a socket with O rings as glass tubes would be very fragile and I would expect warnings in the manual instructing the ground staff to make sure the glass tubes are intact.
1612492870534.png

1612493012800.png

1612493127074.png
 
Last edited:
To answer your original question, yes the plumbing all detached with the tank, leaving just the bomb rack and sway braces as drag producers.

If you are an aircorpslibrary.com member you can go to drawing 109-48181 which is one of the two breakaway fittings installed in each wing and you can see where it is installed on drawing 106-14037 sheet 5. It has two O rings to seal where the pipe slips in. The other, similar, fitting is on the leading edge skin.

No glass tubes used anywhere (another one of those myths that keep rearing their ugly heads).

Since the recent site changes you may be able to view the drawing without being a member.

The fittings show in my Parts Catalog but have no part numbers - they are at the wing skin end of pipes 55 & 56
1612496906614.png
 
Last edited:
Fascinating and very much appreciated info. Thank you everybody for taking the time to assist me.
 
....No glass tubes used anywhere (another one of those myths that keep rearing their ugly heads)....

Just to be clear. glass break away fittings are not a "myth". While it may be true that there is no mention of them in the P-51 manual, the DH Mosquito B.35 manual makes clear mention of them:

Capture.JPG


The accompanying detail in figure 6 points to item 1 being the glass tubes for both the fuel and pressure lines.

Capture1.JPG
 
Most interesting. The P-51, A6M and Ki43 used self seal couplings so I would have expected the same of other nations. So now I guess the next interesting question is what did the German and Italian aircraft use?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back