Perun: Building the Worst WW2 Air Force

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Acheron

Airman 1st Class
238
173
Nov 16, 2019
Youtuber Perun posted this video:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g37zdE8jrg4

To summarize, he had follow youtuber and Aussie AnimarchyHistory‬ choose a couple of terrible World War 2 aircraft, with Perun finding reasons for why an air force (immediately post WW2) should get these.

The aircraft Animarchy choose:

Air-superiority fighter: Ryan FR Fireball
Interceptor: Messerschmitt Me 163 Komet
Heavy bomber: Petlyakov Pe-8
Multi-role bomber: Heinkel He 177 Greif
Anti-submarine warfare aircraft: Kyushu Q1W

Your thoughts? I liked Perun's sales pitches for the various aircraft.
 
There's a few YT creators who took up the "Elbonian Air Force" worst air force challenge. I think Ed Nash's Military Matters/Forgotten Aircraft and/or Rex's Hangar might have taken up the challenge.
Someone chose the XB-40 as Elbonia's air superiority fighter.
 
Put a me 163 on a train and then fire it, Natter wise.
Like the train aaa, very much feared and o so succes full
This bundle of Joy will get a more then a few goose.
Land near train under cover of said very succesfull aaa.
Then move.
Yes we loose a few in "accidents" but not as much as JG53./2 that almos lost all⁸ in 1 sortie, airplanes and worse.... pilots.
Soon we have 24 rocket salvo per ship.
It will be the Black Pearl broad firing again.

There is no allied airplane that can catch a Komet under steam. Nor will there be.

Building is cheap. Engine is cheap, rockets are cheap, losses will be lower then in your 109 or 190 or 152 because it can not be caught.
No need for high grade alloys. No oil for fuel.

Just a netwerk of train platforms operating as mobile launch pads. I know it will catch on in the near future.
 
Put a me 163 on a train and then fire it, Natter wise.
Like the train aaa, very much feared and o so succes full
This bundle of Joy will get a more then a few goose.
Land near train under cover of said very succesfull aaa.
Then move.
Yes we loose a few in "accidents" but not as much as JG53./2 that almos lost all⁸ in 1 sortie, airplanes and worse.... pilots.
Soon we have 24 rocket salvo per ship.
It will be the Black Pearl broad firing again.

There is no allied airplane that can catch a Komet under steam. Nor will there be.

Building is cheap. Engine is cheap, rockets are cheap, losses will be lower then in your 109 or 190 or 152 because it can not be caught.
No need for high grade alloys. No oil for fuel.

Just a netwerk of train platforms operating as mobile launch pads. I know it will catch on in the near future.
I'm on my phone and it won't let me award anything but "like". Remind me to give you a funny later.
 
I'm on my phone and it won't let me award anything but "like". Remind me to give you a funny later.
Robs phone being this:

1736317653775.png
 
Youtuber Perun posted this video:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g37zdE8jrg4

To summarize, he had follow youtuber and Aussie AnimarchyHistory‬ choose a couple of terrible World War 2 aircraft, with Perun finding reasons for why an air force (immediately post WW2) should get these.

The aircraft Animarchy choose:

Air-superiority fighter: Ryan FR Fireball
Interceptor: Messerschmitt Me 163 Komet
Heavy bomber: Petlyakov Pe-8
Multi-role bomber: Heinkel He 177 Greif
Anti-submarine warfare aircraft: Kyushu Q1W

Your thoughts? I liked Perun's sales pitches for the various aircraft.

Ryan Fireball wasn't bad for the ten minutes or so mixed power fighters made sense.

For interceptor, I'd suggest the Bachem Natter.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back