Picture of the day. (3 Viewers)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules


A badly pixelated picture has no relevance on flight characteristics. Would you know and feel how a ferrari handles just by looking at a poster? But, no, actually it was for the simple reason i dont play video games and have never used photoshop. So to an untrained eye, and while i deduced there were anomalies i reasoned it was 50/50 Plus Russian aircraft are not my speciality hence the citation. But i like the way you slipped one final dig at me in there and then suggested the whole subject to be dropped. It gives me a good insight into your mentality. But anyway, as for the other comments, its not whats said that bothers me, its just the repetition. If one or two people had corrected a comment, and i then came across it. Me personally, i would feel rehashing the same statement to be a little bit like overkill. But then again it is a social forum. And everyone enjoys the chance to correct others rightly or wrongly. Behavioral science is a side study of mine. No offence intended and no offence taken. Life is too short to hold grudges so i'll say no more on the subject.
 
Last edited:
I should point out that the damage to that IL-2 is beyond what an aircraft can sustain and remain airworthy.
What you're seeing there is a screenshot from the sim IL-2: Sturmovik that's been crudely doctored.
What I noticed was the item sticking up on the trailing edge of the right wing (Like a spoiler.) and the rudder is neutral. No Yaw? (Not to mention the general appearance.)
 
What I noticed was the item sticking up on the trailing edge of the right wing (Like a spoiler.) and the rudder is neutral. No Yaw? (Not to mention the general appearance.)
As i said before im not too hot on the IL-2, but yes i see you're point. If that's part of the aileron or trim, being stuck in the raised position like that would cause the aircraft to bank/roll hard over unless corrections were made or even possible. You are surmising (quite rightly) that because the aircraft is in level flight it's an obvious fake. Aside from the other red flags. If the pic were real, the pic could have been taken at such a time that it just happened to capture the aircraft in level flight if only for a second. Which is why i like to stay objective, and not jump to the first conclusion. But that's just an example, the photo is an obvious fake. My comments were nothing personal, i don't make judgements about people i dont know. And maybe i am a little bit too prickly to criticism. Im an old fashioned hands on grease monkey, and when it comes to aircraft even more so. Online internet technology is most definitely not my forte. Hence my lack of knowledge of what is possible with tools like photoshop.
 
Real IL 2 .... they died in swarms

View attachment 494786
Not trying to be argumentative, but many luftwaffe pilots (especially new pilots) often emptied their whole ammunition drums on IL2's and still were not able to bring them down. IL2's were heavily metal plated, especially around the cockpit and engine. There was a method German pilots had to use to make sure of a kill. I have some interview footage of Gunther Rall explaining this issue somewhere.... I think a large number of IL2 losses came from ground fire, pilot error and mechanical problems. But not having checked the numbers im just giving my opinion not stating a fact.
 
I see. Here is a diagram showing the location of the oil cooler. The " маслoрадиатор" = oil cooler.



And here is the armour diagram with the thickenss of the steel plates used in millimeters. As you may notice the oil cooler plates at the bottom and sides were of the 6 mm ( other source says 8 mm). So the one was protected from the rear, front and also from the top by the armoured fuselage A different matter is if the 6-8 mm for the bottom plate was enough for protecting against the AA fire. But the cockpit sides were of the same in the thickness armour plates.Additionally please notice that there was the rear armour bulkhead behind the rear gunner's station what was also a kind of protection of the gunner.

 
Painting representing German paratroopers ''Fallschirmjäger'' enter in Holland during the West Front offensive by the German Army in May 1940. During the first 9 months of the war, Hitler decided not to attack on the Western Front in order to mobilize his troops for the conquest of Poland and the Baltic States. But, once his conquest of the East ended, the attack of France began, Hitler directed his forces through the forest of the Ardennes deemed impassable by the Allies in order to circumvent the line Maginot and encircling the advanced French army in Belgium. The conquest of Holland was made by the German paratroopers, the "Fallschirmjäger", proof of the modernity of the German army. Picture by Fortunio Matania. -
Fortunino Matania - Wikipedia
 

When did the Germans go to double riders?
 

Users who are viewing this thread