Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
You would be wrong. It is in combining the soviet documents like pilots, engine numbers, frame numbers that tell a story. That is why quite a few "victories" the Luftwaffe claimed can be debated. For the simple fact it didnt burn nor crash nor was the pilot deadRegarding them as accurate strikes me as unwise.
You would be wrong right there.I'm not responding to this thread anymore since it's clear that people aren't listening to me and they are ignoring my posts. People either seem to ignore my post entirely, or go back previous points which I have already explained. Even when I prove conclusively with evidence people just ignore it. People don't like their beliefs challenged and get upset when someone proves them wrong. So that's fine, but I won't be checking this thread anymore.
Including primary sources does NOT produce another primary source. It means you have some well-referenced data in your work. It says nothing about the rest of the work.Genda's Blade includes primary sources so it is a primary source.
A damaged aircraft isn't a destroyed aircraft
I think they are reliable because Horvath has found several wreckages of aircraft and matched their serial numbers with records in the Soviet archives
Your posts are full of contradictions. You say something and three lines below you say the opposite.I'm not responding to this thread anymore since it's clear that people aren't listening to me and they are ignoring my posts. People either seem to ignore my post entirely, or go back previous points which I have already explained. Even when I prove conclusively with evidence people just ignore it. People don't like their beliefs challenged and get upset when someone proves them wrong. So that's fine, but I won't belaims in Korea? checking this thread anymore.
I think they are reliable because Horvath has found several wreckages of aircraft and matched their serial numbers with records in the Soviet archives
Me too, get the biggest part in the sight hold steady and let rip potato chip, watch the tracers, watch for the flash of a strike but most importantly fill the sight by getting in close, no time for fancy.I'd spray and pray.
So you didn't invent trans-phasic interwarp FTL drive?I think we've all known characters who loved to say outlandish things just to shock people.
Especially when they may be a little drunk.
Whatever that is, I invented it.So you didn't invent trans-phasic interwarp FTL drive?
I think I would at first, especially over England, bore right in singling one bomber out and giving it the beans, we all would until we got a few kills under out belt...and hope not to fixate.
A friend who was a naval aviator, and Air Guardsman, related one of his early training missions was a mock combat with a group of other fighters. He described how he became a victim of target fixation and nearly collided with his target, which only evaded destruction when the rear seater spotted the rapidly closing attacker and warned his pilot to dive out.I think I would at first, especially over England, bore right in singling one bomber out and giving it the beans, we all would until we got a few kills under out belt.
Something that includes primary sources isn't a primary source; it's a secondary one.Genda's Blade includes primary sources so it is a primary source.
A damaged aircraft isn't a destroyed aircraft
I think they are reliable because Horvath has found several wreckages of aircraft and matched their serial numbers with records in the Soviet archives
The trick is to come back to normal when the war stops. Let's all hope we never have to contend with that and that, if we have, we manage to come back to normal when its over.
I think this is the first time I've ever seen those two words in the same sentence on this Forum.