Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
DeHavilland used magnesium in the Gipsy Major series of engines, and I understand in the Gipsy Queen and six series as well. The top cover and rear case was Mg.
Yes the barrels are steel but the heads are Al alloy.Weren't the cylinder barrels steel?
Eh?
Cast aluminium is cast aluminium. According to my metallurgy textbook, cast iron is anywhere between 2 and 6.67% carbon. 6.67% carbon makes it a mineral called cementite Fe3C, not a metal at all. Apparently, 2.5 to 4% is normal. They don't heat treat it for higher strength. They might anneal it to relieve stresses.
I gave up (again) when pure elements were being compared to alloys, and materials with yield properties were compared to those without. Some cannot grasp the idea that materials dont have a yield value even when shown a table with no yield value quoted, it has happened before here. I could also add that while steels are supposedly an alloy of carbon and iron, some steels have almost no carbon in them like 0.03% they can have up to 28%Chrome and 5% Nickel, these steels do have a "carbon equivalent" which is quoted in the material specification. Cast irons are not necessarily cast material, and what is called "quenching" on carbon steels is called "solution heat treatment" on stainless steels. Temperatures which normalise carbon steels can sensitise stainless steel and so on and so forth, which I am sure you know but others dont.Pure aluminium, most commercial aluminium, the 3000 and most 5000 series alloys cannot be heat treated to increase strength but ALL the structural alloys used in aircraft have a multitude of heat treatments, the vast majority of which are to increase strength.
The attached is from a USN training pub dated 1945 that gives you the basics of the time. 17 is now 2017, 24 is now 2024, 53 is now 5053 and 61 is now 6061. 7075 was just coming into use outside of Japan where it was developed.
Not covered are the many different quenching systems that all produce distinct differences in properties which is why you now find alloys with a heat treat codes like 351. Also not covered are processes like taking annealed alloy, normalizing it then quenching it to -40C before working it instead of working it first then normalizing it.
A modern heat treat primer for aircraft alloys is far longer and very boring even when you need to know the process.
Only the thin liner.Weren't the cylinder barrels steel?
No, the whole barrel was steel, with an al alloy head threaded onto it, for air-cooled engines.Only the thin liner.
Not covered are the many different quenching systems that all produce distinct differences in properties which is why you now find alloys with a heat treat codes like 351. Also not covered are processes like taking annealed alloy, normalizing it then quenching it to -40C before working it instead of working it first then normalizing it.
Sorry in the case of the earlier R-1820 and R-2600 you`re quite right they were steel.No, the whole barrel was steel, with an al alloy head threaded onto it, for air-cooled engines.
Only the thin liner.
This all brings back all that stuff I had to learn when sitting my engineering papers... Completely useless to a Ramp Tramp!
Actually that only applies to some of the liquid cooled engines in aviation. Many of those have a steel barrel (called liner) clamped by, but otherwise not touching, the water jacket.
The air cooled engine usually have a steel barrel incorporating steel fins machined in and then an Al alloy head either screwed and shrunk on (most common) or bolted on.
View attachment 652457
Like the copper content of 2024 which is totally irrelevant because there is nothing you can do to change that part from 2025 to 7075 or any other alloy.