buffnut453
Captain
Whatever went on, it smacks of meeting the letter of the contract but not delivering a quality product that could actually perform as advertised under operational conditions.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
More like fraudWhatever went on, it smacks of meeting the letter of the contract but not delivering a quality product that could actually perform as advertised under operational conditions.
On 13 April 1940 the British ordered 675 of the Bell Model 14, the export version of the P-39, which they named the Caribou. They specified two .50 cal nose guns, a 20MM Hispano instead of the 37MM cannon of the P-39, four .303 wing guns, and a maximum speed of of 394 mph at rated altitude, plus or minus 4%.
378.2 - 409.8 mph
But the drag reduction mods were not applied to the rest of the production run. Testing in England of a standard production Caribou, renamed Airacobra I in 1941, showed a top speed of only 359 mph.
Why?
How do you figure?More like fraud
As a general rule promising something and then not delivering something with money being involved usually fits the definition.How do you figure?
The drag reductions reduced weight by 200 pounds, considering they were expecting the a/c to meet this capability in production models -- it's ridiculous that they didn't incorporate this into the line.The British knew about the weight increases, they were probably their idea.
The British were the purchasers on the contract. Acting like they didn't know what they were doing, or that Bell somehow cheated them is crazy.You keep blaming the British, any real source for this?
There seems to have been a problem with the drag calculations, seeing as most (all?) Of the modifications were drag reduction ones.
Granted expectations changed but most countries wanted combat capable aircraft and in 1940/41 that included guns and protection. Things the prototype XP-39 lacked and Bell seemed to take no account of.
They promised a service aircraft with the same performance as the unequipped prototypes and in fact, their prototype never flew at speeds they claimed.
Our RAF didn't want their Cobras, they lacked the altitude performance needed over Western Europe, and there was a long list of defects to fix, so we gave 212 to the Russians who tested them out for 6 months, fixed the defects and evolved group area fighting tactics for them. They couldn't get enough of them. Half of all the Russian aces flew Cobras. The top scoring allied fighter aces, flew Cobras.Whatever went on, it smacks of meeting the letter of the contract but not delivering a quality product that could actually perform as advertised under operational conditions.