Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
She lost to the Apache. But many of the concepts are being applied today in Sikorsky's attempt to exceed 260kts in the X2..
Weird, two lift rotors and and push one, and why it needs a compensation one ?
Usually the helicopters with double rotors hare counterrotative propellers so avoing the compensation in the tail.
Weird, two lift rotors and and push one, and why it needs a compensation one ?
Usually the helicopters with double rotors hare counterrotative propellers so avoing the compensation in the tail.
Not sure I understand your question CB. The Cheyenne had a single main rotor, a tail rotor to counteract torque and a push rotor for speed.
The Sikorsky X2 is two counter-rotating main rotors (thus no tail rotor for torque) and a push rotor for speed.
Did I miss something?
Disregard my last. I see it was a pusher prop, not a tailrotor. So, how would the X2 generate a yawing moment with two rotors on a single shaft?