Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Why did they not think it would make full production Joe? Was it a case of too expensive or were there other reasons - like it not really being required?I worked for Sikorsky briefly in the early 1990s - I got to see the first one when it was at final assembly - pretty interesting ship but even then Sikorsky folks didn't think it would make it into full production.
BILL CLINTON! Need I say more!?!Why did they not think it would make full production Joe? Was it a case of too expensive or were there other reasons - like it not really being required?
Yeah she was an interesting helo, would of been interesting to see how she compared to the Ka-50. I suspect she would of been a lot better as the Ka-50 is probably around the level of the current attack helo's of the US.
Why did they not think it would make full production Joe? Was it a case of too expensive or were there other reasons - like it not really being required?
Also to be in stealth mod would reduce available weapons load because I think the AH-64D, the OH-6 Little Bird and other attack helicopters all carry the lions share of their attack ordinance on pylons. Whereas to get the benefit of stealth the RAH-66 Comanche would be relying on internal weapons load...
What was reason behind the cancellation of this machine ?
I remember seen some Discovery Channel documentry years ago and the bird looked very promising, at list at that time.
The Commanche was steeped in requirements for a cold war scenario. It was the right machine for a different time. And the $Billions that it cost have been freed up to pay for much more relavant equipment like the Lakota which frees up the Black Hawk for more missions.
A reason good enough, too bad the money expended in development.