Show me where I said Hilter detroyed the remaining aircraft. The only thing Hitler destroyed in the end was Germany.
Do you have figures on how many German a/c the russians destroyed after the war? In East Prussia/poland/hungary/austria/chez/yugoslavia/rumania? if you do please post.
You honestly think the Allies shot down all day fighters up to the mid-1943? rather then then the Germans scrapped/recycled/converted? if you do please post.
I see that you have posted what are close to total Russian losses for basically everything that flies (less than what Krivosheev says, but more than just their fighter losses), but have elected to post some of the losses for fighters for the LW. how is that a comparable series of numbers?, especially when it is considered that more than half the Soviet losses were due to ground fire. For that period of the war after Kursk, there were not enough German fighter formations to make that much of a difference really....the main defenders of the german ground forces were its flak units, at least after Kursk.
I have the figures on Russian aircraft destroyed after the war, but aircraft destroyed in say Rumania (just to look at one of the countries you mentioned) would have had to have been lost before the end of hostilities. Many German aircraft were destroyed on the ground, many could not move for lack of fuel. However these aircraft were not destroyed after the war, or even close to the end of the war. Figures given by the sources previously quoted, as well as people like hayward Bergstrom and Murray the good colonel clearly show that was not the case. The germans were basically losing aircraft as fast, or faster than they could produce them. And if the destruction was on the ground, or in the air, whether it was by German demolition teams or by advancing Russians, is irrelelvant. if it was lost during the war, it doesnt matter how, or by whom....it was a loss suffered on the eastern front, because of actions taken by the soviets (either direct or indirect....it doesnt matter...a loss is a loss is a loss)
Your original post was that the a germans were not monstered by the Soviets, and losses were only relatively light. Your figures as they turn out are allegedly only for fighters, which is a misleading response to the original position taken by GregP, and ap[pear to be only for losses suffered in the air. Even these figures are at odds, and significantly lower than those given by caldwell, as posted by Milosh. And finally, the figures you quote dont include non-operational losses, which were staggeringly heavy on the Eastern Front. Whilst I agree that the Soviets did not get the better of the LW fighters, it did inflict a lot of losses on the LW, far more thasn you are posting, and, more to the point, the eastern front, with all its environmental hardships, did get the better of the LW overall. The east front played an important part in the demise of the LW, and posting partial loss figures for one arm of the LW whilst in the same post listing nearly the total losses for their oppoents is just propagandising the information.
You need to shoot straighter and answer the questions, like how many German aircraft were lost, not a select sample of some of the fighters lost compared to the total losses for the Soviets, so that comparability is built into your figures.