Recent Purchases (7 Viewers)

Now that is very nice, Wojtek!
You're right, girls are needed not for the tights, but why are they so expensive to run, one way or the other?
My Jeep 4 litre costs less to keep going! He He!!
 
THX :) :wave:
 
I agree with Terry ,Wojtek I thought that spitfire was 1/48

2 very nicely done models,the antenna wire really pushes it up a notch
 
:oops: but THX. :)
 
Today I picked up another Airfix 1:48 Spitfire Vc to go with these decals I bought from Waynes mate at the model expo. :cool:
 

Attachments

  • decals.jpg
    decals.jpg
    31.4 KB · Views: 90
I'm sure she should. For my Airfix Spifire Mk.Vc I have ZP X and QY G markings.
 
Hi airboiy. Nice find on the Revell Lancs. I presume they're 1/72nd scale, not, as you posted, 1/48th scale? If so they were both originally issued in 1966/67, I remember getting one of each as a Christmas present, when I was 15! They're not too bad, especially the 'Upkeep' mine on the Dam Buster, but the framework on the canopy/turrets is a bit heavy, IIRC. Don't forget to discard the ventral guns on the Dam Buster, they weren't fitted when the aircraft resched the Squadron.

thanks for the tip. they are 1:72 scale, sorry for the mistype:oops: i have found pics of actual lancs w/ the ventral turret on top and bottom. the build is going well. the other lanc will be a non-armed civil type.:D
 
For sure it is a 1/32 scale kit but it is not a P-40E but P-40B.What is a huge difference.
 

Attachments

  • P-40B.jpg
    P-40B.jpg
    77.7 KB · Views: 95
I'm sure she should. For my Airfix Spifire Mk.Vc I have ZP X and QY G markings.

Cool. I've got some pics of these aircraft, if you want me to post them just sing out.
 
457 sqn RAAF ZP-X :Jiminy Cricket" F/O Hamilton.
 

Attachments

  • 457sqnRAAF6.jpg
    457sqnRAAF6.jpg
    28.8 KB · Views: 85
  • 457sqnRAAF7.jpg
    457sqnRAAF7.jpg
    25.8 KB · Views: 97
  • 457sqnRAAF9.jpg
    457sqnRAAF9.jpg
    20.4 KB · Views: 95
  • 457sqnRAAF11.jpg
    457sqnRAAF11.jpg
    18.9 KB · Views: 95
Great shots Andy mate :)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back