- Thread starter
-
- #41
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Udet said:Der Adler:
I get your point very well. Also I share a similar view on the matter: losses had a more signficant impact in the ranks of the Luftwaffe by late 1944. No one will deny this.
That the USAAF could replace losses easier than the Luftwaffe is true. However I believe the issue has gone overboard. Again, the USAAF had a superior capability to replace losses but saying it was "easy" is misleading.
Losses for the USAAF were very very high fighting the Luftwaffe. The USAAF was not the armed branch of a country like the soviet union where the lives of their soldiers meant virtually nothing. Losses of course had a negative effect on USAAF personnel.
Try to imagine the mood at the USAAF bases the night of December 29, 1944 knowing 294 B-26 men (9th Air Force alone, add those KIA from lost fighters and bombers from the 8th) did not return from the mission.