Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Found some more bits of data in my notes. I have these aircraft listed as operating out of 42 Base. Unfortunately I do not remember where I got this info, but I am pretty sure most of it was from online sources.
Halifax Mk V LL130 operating as target marker / bomber
27 August 43 Night Operation against Nuremberg
bomb load: 1x4000 HC + 3x1000 MC + 5x250 TI
Halifax Mk II JB863 operating as target marker / bomber
30 August 1943 Night Operation against Munchen Gladbach
bomb load: 1x4000 HC + 6x1000 MC + 4x250 TI
Halifax Mk II JB781 operating as target marker / bomber
6 September 1943 Night Operation against Munich
bomb load: 1x4000 HC + 2x1000 MC + 4x250 TI
Found some more bits of data in my notes. I have these aircraft listed as operating out of 42 Base. Unfortunately I do not remember where I got this info, but I am pretty sure most of it was from online sources.
Halifax Mk V LL130 operating as target marker / bomber
27 August 43 Night Operation against Nuremberg
bomb load: 1x4000 HC + 3x1000 MC + 5x250 TI
Halifax Mk II JB863 operating as target marker / bomber
30 August 1943 Night Operation against Munchen Gladbach
bomb load: 1x4000 HC + 6x1000 MC + 4x250 TI
Hey 33k in the air,
Did some more searching online re Halifax Mk II R9487 the 8000 lb HC and found this:
View attachment 652756
At the very top of the image I think it says that R9487 was operating with 76 Squadron at the time of the mission.
Pointblank and Beyond by Lionel Lacey-Johnson, appendix 8 quoting AIR 24/269.
The Lancaster fuel load in gallons was track miles divided by 0.95 plus a 200 gallon reserve.
Halifax II fuel load in gallons was track miles divided by 0.83 plus a 200 gallon reserve.
Halifax III fuel load in gallons was track miles divided by 0.80 plus a 200 gallon reserve.
Stirling fuel load in gallons was track miles divided by 0.75 plus a 300 gallon reserve.
Weights available for bombs and window, in pounds
800 track miles, Lancaster 17,200, Halifax II 11,800, Halifax III 13,360, Stirling 10,475
1,200 track miles, Lancaster 14,150, Halifax II 8,320, Halifax III 9,260, Stirling 6,625
1,400 track miles (last Stirling entry), Lancaster 12,620, Halifax II 6,600, Halifax III 7,480, Stirling 4,695
1,500 track miles (last Halifax II entry), Lancaster 11,880, Halifax II 5,470, Halifax III 6,560
10/11 Apr 1942 first 8,000 pound bomb dropped, on Essen, by a Halifax
For the war Halifax aircraft with Bomber Command dropped 1x8,000 pound HC (in 1942) and 476x4,000 pound HC (40 in 1941 and 427 in 1942) (Air 22/203)
Halifax 4,000 pound bombs dropped from Air 14/928 and 929
3 on 15/16 Jun 41
1 on 17/18 Jun 41
1 on 23/24 Jun 41
4 on 14/15 Jul 41
3 on 19/20 Jul 41
1 on 21/22 Jul 41
1 on 25/26 Jul 41
4 on 30/31 Jul 41
4 on 5/6 Aug 41
5 on 7/8 Aug 41
2 on 16/17 Aug 41
2 on 24/25 Aug 41
1 on 28/29 Aug 41
2 on 29/30 Aug 41
3 on 31 Aug/1 Sep 41
2 on 15/16 Sep 41
1 on 30 Nov/1 Dec 41
2 on 10/11 Jan 42
2 on 26/27 Feb 42
6 on 3/4 Mar 42
10 on 8/9 Mar 42
5 on 30/31 Mar 42
10 on 8/9 Apr 42
11 on 12/13 Apr 42, interesting as only 10 aircraft credited with attacking
8 on 14/15 Apr 42
10 on 27/28 Apr 42, "includes special fillings"
9 on 28/29 Apr 42, "includes special fillings"
10 on 3/4 May 42
2 on 6/7 May 42
4 on 8/89 May 42
21 on 19/20 May 42
32 on 29/30 May 42, 16 aircraft credited with attacking.
30 on 8/9 Jul 42
21 on 13/14 Jul 42
37 on 21/22 Jul 42, 36 aircraft credited with attacking.
37 on 23/24 Jul 42, 36 aircraft credited with attacking.
24 on 25/26 Jul 42
20 on 26/27 Jul 42
28 on 39/30 Jul 42
53 on 31 Jul/1 Aug 42
22 on 6/7 Aug 42
2 on 1/2 Sep 42
7 on 5/6 Oct 42
4 on 15/16 Oct 42
RAF Squadrons by Jefford, in terms of their Halifax equipment order it was 35, 77, 10, 102, 78, 405, 158, 408 squadrons
10 Squadron received Halifax in December 1941
35 Squadron received Halifax in November 1940, first operation 10 March 1941
76 Squadron formed and received Halifax in May 1941
78 Squadron received Halifax in March 1942
102 Squadron received Halifax in December 1941
158 Squadron received Halifax in June 1942
405 Squadron received Halifax in April 1942
408 squadron received Halifax in September 1942
HiOne quite interesting thing I've noted in the 77 Squadron ORBs is that the route is listed for each mission. That allows for the calculation of actual flight distance to be flown, as opposed to the nominal straight-line distance from the base to target.
I did this for two missions out of curiosity.
3/4 March 1943 to Hamburg: the straight-line round trip distance would be 896 miles, but the round trip flight route distance was 968 miles, or 8% greater.
9/10 March 1943 to Munich: the straight-line round trip distance would be 1,348 miles, but the round trip flight route distance was 1,561 miles, or nearly 16% greater.
The aircraft for both was the Halifax II, with the Hamburg mission carrying a nominal bomb load of 6,200 lbs, while the Munich mission load was 4,480 lbs.
ETA: The ORBs for 10 Squadron also show the route to be flown. Anyone know of any others that list the route path?
Hi
The book 'By Day & By Night, The Bomber War in Europe 1939-45' by Ken Merrick, contains some general raid route maps, for example Leipzig on 19/20 February 1944:
Compare with the reproduction of a 4 Group route map in the book 'From Hull, Hell and Halifax':
Also from Merrick a raid route map for the Chemnitz 14/15 February 1945, when there was more 'friendly' territory to fly over:
Mike
Looking at these pics it seems like the Stirling should have had a B-29's wingspan. Now that would have been a super high altitude platform for 1939-40. Pressurization may be necessary.I would like to talk about the Short Stirling,. On wikipedia I read, that it was required to have a narrow wingspan to fit into exisitng hangars back then, compromising its performance. So far so good, but then I come across this image, also on wikipedia:
View attachment 651867
I can't help but notice that the Stirling has only 89 centimeters less wingspan than the Lancaster and actually 8 cm more than the Halifax. So I am confused by the previous statement. Did they mean that the Stirling should have had an even larger wing than the others? It look bigger on the sideview.
Two other points, I read that the ceiling of the aircraft was abysmal, for example unable to fly over the alps, instead having to fly through them. On the other hand, I also read that it was surprisingly maneuverable, able to outturn heavier fighters, I assume like Ju-88 long-range-fighter variants? Are these stories true?
HiSo, the Stirling was too big for its wings(pan)?
Wasn't it also used as a transport? How did it do in that role? Given its size, it better did well, or I have to really question if it was an even decent design.
Picking up on the issue of RAF hangar design, the largest hangars for landplanes in WW1 were designed in 1917/18 with a span of either 80 or 100 feet.Starting in the 1930's, the RAF had hangars with openings well over 100 feet, like the "C", "J" and "K" types.
It would be refreshing if publications didn't use wiki as a source of info and actually did some research.