Sukhoi Fighter Starting Flight Tests

• Feb 4, 2010

• #61

tomo pauk

Creator of Interesting Threads

14,490

4,748

Apr 3, 2008

imalko said:

Few more photos I found on the internet. Not significant in the terms of aircraft performance, but I find interesting that this aircraft apparently has aft sliding cockpit canopy. Not a feature you can see often on modern fighters.

Click to expand...

I'd venture to sat that inner volume is huge, so the decent combat range weaponry carried will not dictate external carriage of items, which compromise low observability.

 

• Feb 4, 2010

• #62

DerAdlerIstGelandet

Private Chemtrail Disperser

Staff

Mod

50,292

15,910

Nov 8, 2004

USA/Germany

What I think is neat is that no matter how you look at it, it looks like a Sukhoi. Someone who has no clue what the aircraft is, will know that it is a Sukhoi.

 

• Feb 9, 2010

• #63

Matt308

Glock Perfection

18,961

94

Apr 12, 2005

Washington State

Interesting pics from her first flight in AvWeek. But what is most noticeable are the stright engine intakes, forward canards, separated engine inlets from the fuselage, nose mounted IRST and wing accessories.

She's a beauty! But looks like an amalgamation of an F-15 wing, Su-27 planform, F-22'ish inlets with F-18 pedigree.

And that cockpit canopy is not too stealthy now is it.

 

• Mar 8, 2010

• #64

imalko

Chief Master Sergeant

3,777

298

Mar 2, 2009

Vojvodina, Serbia

Some new photos found on the internet...

 

• Mar 8, 2010

• #65

tomo pauk

Creator of Interesting Threads

14,490

4,748

Apr 3, 2008

Fully movable vertical control surface(s)... Not too-often seen feature.
Looking at wing vertical surfaces sizes shapes of two Sukhois, seems that supercruise was the goal all along.

 

• Mar 8, 2010

• #66

B

Butters

Senior Airman

347

2

Jan 25, 2009

South Shore of Nova Scotia

Thanks. imalko!

I haven't seen the two lower pics. They're the first I've seen where you could make a good comparison of the size of the T-50 vis the Flanker. It's clearly not only much smaller in OA volume but also looks to be much cleaner aerodynamically, which considering that it will be pumping out as least as much dry thrust, suggests that it should be able to supercruise with ease.

With it's big AESA X-band radar, twin AESA L-band leading edge search radars, and an advanced IRST, it's looking to be a very formidable adversary for the JSF.

JL

BTW, somebody scoffed the engines from that Flanker

EDIT: This guy's site has some great pics and info on the T-50. And lotsa speculation, of course...

http://www.paralay.iboards.ru/viewforum.php?f=5

 

Last edited: Mar 8, 2010

• Mar 8, 2010

• #67

tomo pauk

Creator of Interesting Threads

14,490

4,748

Apr 3, 2008

T-50 features another novelty - movable LERX. Those could be seen at 1st 2nd picture from latest post by Imalko.

 

• Mar 8, 2010

• #68

Matt308

Glock Perfection

18,961

94

Apr 12, 2005

Washington State

tomo pauk said:

Fully movable vertical control surface(s)... Not too-often seen feature.
.

Click to expand...

Like the 1960's SR-71 perhaps (not fully articulated but damn close)

I'm waiting for vertical control surfaces that can articulate anhedral/dihedral to vary stealth effects. Say full 90 degrees (F-15) for maximum vertical control surface effect to 10-15 degree YF-23 maximum stealth mode. Would be a flight contro lprogrammer's mechanical system engineer's nightmare but certainly worth it.

 

• Mar 10, 2010

• #69

W

Waynos

Staff Sergeant

1,309

10

May 18, 2008

or even the 1950's A-5 Vigilante Matt, I'm sure there are others too (TSR 2 was another) but it is still quite rare.

I don't think the engine intakes are as straight as they first seemed either. The head on view seems to show plenty of opportunity for the expected stealth considerations to be applied.

This is, of course, only a prototype too. The almost cartoony YF-22 was a very very different machine from the F-22A.