Sukhoi Fighter Starting Flight Tests
- Thread starter seesul
- Start date
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Matt308
Glock Perfection
The engines used are the same for the Su-35. Indigenous engines are still in development. I have read that the intro date is 2018+. Given the Su-27 development, I suspect that is conservative.
Also note that the inlets are in direct alignment with the engine fan blades. Not too stealthy now is it. Even with inlet diffusers.
She is a beauty. Does remind one of the F-23... which should have won on sheer beauty alone against the F-22.
Also note that the inlets are in direct alignment with the engine fan blades. Not too stealthy now is it. Even with inlet diffusers.
She is a beauty. Does remind one of the F-23... which should have won on sheer beauty alone against the F-22.
Last edited:
B-17engineer
Colonel
+1,,looks real original
Bingo.
vikingBerserker
Lieutenant General
Yea, I agree - but the plane is good looking.
imalko
Chief Master Sergeant
Give the Russians some credit. There are similarities between this two aircraft, but T-50 is far from being simply a copy of YF-23.
Attachments
Last edited:
imalko
Chief Master Sergeant
Never stated that T-50 was copy of YF-23... BTW, there are two (2) Russian jets in my posts, so I'm giving the credit
.The 'jump for joy' phrase was pointing out that LM is now more likely to receive more orders for their planes.
The Basket
Senior Master Sergeant
- 3,712
- Jun 27, 2007
Don't think we is saying its a copy.
Don't think that at all.
But it does look very good...the below view looks Sweeeeeet.
But early doors as we say and let's see if the thing goes into production.
Don't think that at all.
But it does look very good...the below view looks Sweeeeeet.
But early doors as we say and let's see if the thing goes into production.
imalko
Chief Master Sergeant
No problem Tomo, I've simply misunderstood your post...
I agree, it will be interesting to fallow the further development of this aircraft.
I agree, it will be interesting to fallow the further development of this aircraft.
Last edited:
I think it is a great looking bird. I wonder what her capabilities are like. Good job to the Russians.
Give credit where it is due guys.
Give credit where it is due guys.
Not trying to be argumentative (though people tell me its natural gift I have) but, supposing all goes to plan of course, I would think it would be more likely to sell better than the Lockheed alternative. If only because Sukhoi wont be squeamish about exports and they tend to be a lot cheaper. In this area the 'similarities' might well prove an asset.
Yes, that does look like two internal tandem weapons bays doesn't it? If so, that would allow for a decent internal load without compromising the stealth. We obviously need, and crave, a closer look
On a related note, the trio of current Western European fighters would be looked as obsolescent in many eyes now. Guess we could see new designs pretty soon, at least as Photoshop jobs.
lol yes, but on a positive note, this should do wonders for Eurofighter and Eurojets request for AESA and 3d TVC in the next lot of Typhoons (and as retrofit to existing frames), supported by the RAF and Luftwaffe as far as I know, but not YET by HMG.
In fact if these measures are not adopted as standard on every Typhoon built we deserve everything we get.
I think the 'Super Typhoon' is the most we can hope for, there will be no European manned 5 gen fighter imho. All energies are now focussed on making such as Neuron and Taranis into operational realities and buying as many F-35 as we can afford between us.
I think the 'full spec' Gripen NG is still competitive, Don't know what plans exist for the Rafale in the future
In fact if these measures are not adopted as standard on every Typhoon built we deserve everything we get.
I think the 'Super Typhoon' is the most we can hope for, there will be no European manned 5 gen fighter imho. All energies are now focussed on making such as Neuron and Taranis into operational realities and buying as many F-35 as we can afford between us.
I think the 'full spec' Gripen NG is still competitive, Don't know what plans exist for the Rafale in the future
Last edited:
red admiral
Senior Airman
- 479
- Mar 24, 2005
Money is always going to be the issue. It's quite easy to improve capability by retrofitting 3D thrust vectoring nozzles and CAESAR, both of them already exist and even give cost savings over the aircraft life. The problem comes when you realise there's no capital available to make the investment for these retrofits (at least currently). Retrofitting EJ270 engines would be nice as well but its unlikely to happen. It's unfortunate that the probable date for a Typhoon mid life update also coincides with the time when we're going to be spending obscene amounts of money buying F-35s.
5th generation European fighter designs already exist, they just don't have any chance of flying. Still, Typhoon and F-35 are going to be around for the next 20-30years and it's difficult to guess what the threat will be at that point. Most interest is going into UCAVs for increased capability and lower costs - there are a lot of issues with air-to-air combat and UCAVs but we don't really know what the level of technology will be in another 20-30years.
The Basket
Senior Master Sergeant
- 3,712
- Jun 27, 2007
Must remember that the Su-27 protoype looked nothing like the operational fighter and that other Sukhoi superfighters like the Su-35 and Su-47 Berkut didnt go anywhere.
Looks more a proof of concept.
Looks more a proof of concept.
imalko
Chief Master Sergeant
Su-47 Berkut was build only as a experimental aircraft and technology demonstrator similar as the German-American X-31. It wasn't intended to enter series production.
Lucky13
Forum Mascot
.....and the cost for this aircraft will be?
The Basket
Senior Master Sergeant
- 3,712
- Jun 27, 2007
Sukhoi did attempt to give the Su-47 a production role as the desgin was flying...came to nothing.
