I noticed that the tail wheels of German fighters were quite large compared to other nation's fighters, adding drag and weight.
Anybody knows why?
Hello Spicmart,
The photographs you have there are a bit misleading. The FW 190 was physically small, but it was fairly heavy.
It was quite a bit heavier than the Spitfire or the Raiden that are also in your photographs.
The drag probably wasn't as bad as one would expect because the wheels tended to be partially retracted.
The FW 190 usually had more of the tire retracted than your photograph of a modern reproduction aircraft shows.
The tail wheel on the Me 109 is a bit of a longer story.
The Me 109 up through the Me 109E had a fixed tail wheel.
The Me 109F and early Me 109G had a partially retractable tail wheel with about half showing below the fuselage underside.
The later 109G gained some weight and needed a bigger tire in the back and the bigger tire would not fit into the same space so it became fixed down.
The photograph you have is the equivalent of a late G model and the tail wheel strut was extended to improve the ground angle at take off and landing.
The Me 109K had a tail wheel strut of about the same length but it was fully retractable behind a pair of doors.
Unfortunately they sometimes had mechanical problems so were fixed down despite the retract mechanism.
- Ivan.