tanker row - So much for that 'special relationship'.

Discussion in 'SitRep' started by Royzee617, Mar 22, 2006.

  1. Royzee617

    Royzee617 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,623
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Occupation:
    Writer
    Location:
    MK UK
    Home Page:
    Spotted this daft situation today - sensitive yank equipment - prob datalinks etc or nav - is preventing Europeans from using tankers cost-effectively.

    "A Government plan to lease out RAF aircraft to the highest bidders has triggered a row that threatens to derail the largest-ever Private Finance Initiative (PFI) scheme, writes Peter Almond, Evening Standard.
    American contractors say they cannot now supply crucial hardware to the project because leasing out the Airbus A330s would breach US laws governing the export of sensitive military technology.
    The GBP13 billion contract for 20 planes for a mid-air refuelling fleet for the RAF was won by the Air Tanker consortium, comprising Eads, Cobham, Rolls-Royce, hales and VT.
    The plan is to cut costs by hiring out the jets to civilian users when they are not wanted by the RAF. Some of the planes would be operated by the RAF but used commercially at weekends. The rest would be in full-time commercial use but available to the RAF when needed.
    But US firm Northrop Grumman says it would be a breach of federal laws governing transfer of sensitive defence material to parties that could deliver it into hostile hands. A Ministry of Defence compromise to remove the systems when the aircraft are not in RAF use has been rejected".

    So much for that 'special relationship'.
     
  2. evangilder

    evangilder "Shooter"
    Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2004
    Messages:
    19,419
    Likes Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Network Engineer/Photographer
    Location:
    Moorpark, CA
    Home Page:
    Ugh, politics in action. I really don't see the Brits "handing over sensitive defense material to hostile hands". geez.
     
  3. the lancaster kicks ass

    the lancaster kicks ass Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,980
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    same with the F-35 stuff..........
     
  4. Royzee617

    Royzee617 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,623
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Occupation:
    Writer
    Location:
    MK UK
    Home Page:
    Loonies have taken over the asylum again...
     
  5. Bullockracing

    Bullockracing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    316
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Occupation:
    United States Air Force
    Location:
    Vivian, Louisiana
    Horse pucky. Northrop Grumman just wants to get the contract themselves. The USAF refuels all sorts of NATO planes already, and vice versa, so I for one don't see the big deal. It's not a super secret squirrel plane that gets to carry fuel anyway.
     
Loading...

Share This Page