Tanks post-2022: what now?

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

I plan on watching this later. I wouldn't watch the "tank is dead" videos by instant experts. The Chieftain seems pretty credible to me.
 
Tanks have always had vulnerabilities, and opposing forces have always had means and methods for dealing with them. They're still a vital part of combined arms, because tanks can do things no other systems can do.
 
Tanks have always had vulnerabilities, and opposing forces have always had means and methods for dealing with them. They're still a vital part of combined arms, because tanks can do things no other systems can do.
Once tanks have an active protection system they will be less vulnerable to MANPATS. That's what will even the chances once more.



 
Once tanks have an active protection system they will be less vulnerable to MANPATS. That's what will even the chances once more.





Cool article and thanks for posting. Just wait 'til lasers get more efficient and can be mounted on tanks.

Also from the article:

The Russian armor had unwisely charged down confined city streets without adequate infantry protection.

Gosh, haven't they learnt a thing?
 
They had far more to spare and were willing to throw machines and tanks away in exchange for victory. They're trying the same now but the equation isn't coming out the same way this time...
 
The Soviets lost over 2,800 tanks during the battle of Berlin - most were due to Panzerfaust AT weapons during the street fighting.

It pays to read history books...

It's not like tanks - infantry + cities = problems is a new equation.
 
Since WWII the USSR / Russia has had military operations which were limited to backing revolutions or rolling into places where the opposition was mainly
comprised of insurgent or militia groups.

This time they have come up against trained and ready combat forces with modern equipment who know how to fight. The results so far speak for themselves.

Even the cleverly bush cammo coloured JD4x4 tank snaffler brigade was not seen as a threat.
 
Since WWII the USSR / Russia has had military operations which were limited to backing revolutions or rolling into places where the opposition was mainly
comprised of insurgent or militia groups.

This time they have come up against trained and ready combat forces with modern equipment who know how to fight. The results so far speak for themselves.

Even the cleverly bush cammo coloured JD4x4 tank snaffler brigade was not seen as a threat.

Gave it a "funny" for your last line, but your point about facing a modern adversary is spot-on.
 
They had far more to spare and were willing to throw machines and tanks away in exchange for victory. They're trying the same now but the equation isn't coming out the same way this time...
Going by memory, the Soviets had over 22,000 AFVs and the Germans had about 1,200 - the Red Army kept sending wave after wave against the Germans until the Germans were literally inundated with bodies and simply could not kill enough fast enough.
 
Yes. The T-34 tank is the second highest produced and during WWII there were 57000 made. It also has the dubious record of
the most losses for a tank type at 44900.
 
Yes. The T-34 tank is the second highest produced and during WWII there were 57000 made. It also has the dubious record of
the most losses for a tank type at 44900.
Why is that "dubious"?

That the Sherman has a better loss/kill ratio then a T-34, is not because of being the better tank, but due to the resistance and quantity of arms brought forward by the Wehrmacht towards the Soviets and the tactics employed by the Soviets.

Any stats in regards to the Sherman's performance operated in Russia?

Regards
Jagdflieger
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back