The airplane that did the most to turn the tide of the war.

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Alright! Now we're talking!
SARO Lerwick.
 
It's been discussed exhaustively elsewhere on the forum about the Lancaster (or derivatives) being used to deploy the Atom Bomb in Japan.
It simply was not going to happen.

The Lanc was briefly considered while the Thin Man was being developed, but the idea was eliminated quickly and with the end of Thin Man's development, no further consideration was discussed.

The modified Silver Plated B-29 testbed proved that the B-29 was up to the task.
 
What did the shock wave hit? The ground or the Enola Gay?
 
We've gone over this in the past. The man tasked with finding an A-bomb capable aircraft, Ramsey, consulted with the Lancaster's designer, Roy Chadwick and gave him the specs for the two A-bomb casing dimensions and was assured by Chadwick that both would fit into a Lancaster bomb-bay. see past post:



and there's this:

"Ramsey was assigned to head the Delivery Group of the Ordnance Division and later
served as deputy to Pasion." His immediate tasks were to design the bomb casings that
would carry the gun-assembly bomb and implosion bomb. By the end of 1943 it had
already been established that the gun-type bomb-Thin Man-would weigh on the order
of five tons. Ramsey assumed that the implosion bomb would weigh approximately the
same. Given their size and weight, there were only two possible choices for an aircraft to
deliver the weapons, the British Lancaster or the American B-29, which had begun
production in September.

Ramsey favored the Lancaster and traveled to Canada in early October 1943 to meet Roy
Chadwick, the plane's chief designer, Chadwick was in Canada to observe the initial
Lancasters coming off the production line at the Victory Aircraft Works, Milton Airdrome,
in Toronto. Ramsey showed Chadwick preliminary sketches of the large-thin-shaped and
stubby shaped-bombs and later wrote with more details.(12) Chadwick assured Ramsey that
the Lancaster could accommodate them.

When Ramsey returned, he wrote to Parsons suggesting that the Lancaster be seriously
considered and planned a memo to General Groves recommending that a modified
Lancaster be used.(13)The bomb bay was thirty-three feet long and sixty-one inches wide.
The depth was only thirty-eight inches, but this could be modified. The Lancaster's ceiling
was 27,000 feet, its speed 285 miles per hour, and takeoff required only 3,750 feet of runway
-a critical matter wherever it would be based.
(12). Norman F, Ramsey Jr. to Roy Chadwick, October 23, 1943, Folder Dr. Norman Ramsey, Box 6,
Tolman Files, RG 227/81, NARA.
(13). Memo, N. F, Ramsey to Capt. W. . Parsons, October 14, 1943, Lancaster Aircraft, Folder Dr Norman Ramsey... NARA
" (Norris, pages 316-317 Racing for the Bomb)
"

Again, the actual FAT MAN width was 60.25in or less.

The fact that the USAAF staff didn't want to use a Lancaster doesn't mean that it wasn't a-bomb capable.

The Lancaster would have struggled to undertake a Tinian->target-Tinian attack profile as per Enola Gay, but it was capable of a Tinian->target->Okinawa mission as per Bock'sCar.
 
Last edited:
Both, first the ground then everything else in its path, in principle it is an expanding sphere of pressure.

Bockscar dropped at 28900ft* and used the 50% greater yield Fatman bomb so the idea that the shockwave was an issue is wrong.

*"Sweeney banked his plane sharply and pushed down from his
28,900-foot altitude..."
 
Last edited:

That makes much more sense than 11.5m when the bomb exploded
 
Bockscar dropped at ~28500ft and used the 50% greater yield Fatman bomb so the idea that the shockwave was an issue is wrong.
It was an issue when no one had dropped one, whatever a physicist calculates these things have to be put into practice to be sure. If a Mosquito could be damaged by a cookie dropped too low, which I have read happened, then a nuclear bomb needed respect.
 

Groves:

The above was very conservative and certainly an overestimate of blast pressure.

Since over pressure drops off rapidly by distance and given the low pressure at altitude, there was almost no risk to the aircraft. A 20 kiloton airburst at ~2000 ft creates an over pressure of about 1psi at ~3 miles at ground level:

 

Wouldn't the B-32 have been another possibility if circumstances required it?
 

Users who are viewing this thread