Shortround6
Major General
Classic example of a weapon that's almost more dangerous than the enemy.
the already mentioned "Davy Crockett" device.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Classic example of a weapon that's almost more dangerous than the enemy.
I read somewhere that the lethal radius of the warhead was 2/3 of the weapon's max range. The one I want to see is the legendary "handgrenuke".
Actually, that is the handgrenuke. Davy Crockett had many names. The idea of creating a weapon that's got a lethal radius that's so close to maximum range seems like glorified suicideThe one I want to see is the legendary "handgrenuke".
Yes. Sabres were rattling MiGs with Sidewinders. On the ground, heavy artillery on the "channel islands" of Quemoy and Matsu were dueling with batteries on the mainland.Was it just Sabre rattling?
Yes, but these guys were the squadron CO and the Maintenance Officer. These are senior squadron officers, not nugget pilots. They would be significantly older than the young bucks, especially in "peace"time.No, I meant the entry age, not when you got your wings. Generally people complete college around 21-22 years of age. From joining to the completion of flight-training seems to be around 1-1/2 years, so you'd be around 23-24 years of age.
Eisenhower also called Mao to the carpet over Taiwan. The prospect of them being nuked was a large part of Mao's decision to leave Taiwan alone.
Correct, in fact that's one of the two ways that the AIM-9 ended up in the hands of the Soviets -- a MiG-17 got popped popped with an AIM-9 which failed to detonate. The other involved a (Norwegian?) officer selling the blueprints to the Soviets (both are quite possible -- the USSR liked to collect intel from two sources).Yes. Sabres were rattling MiGs with Sidewinders.
Was this threat made in '58?Mao threatened to nuke Taiwan at one stage - China got 25 Tu-4s from the Soviets with that in mind, but the nuclear weapons didn't come with the aircraft, thankfully.
Check out the "Second Taiwan Straight Crisis" (yes, there was a first and second crisis) which did occur in 1958.Was this threat made in '58?
We need an emoji for "cringing in horror".
If I recall the range of the rockets typically was around 3400 m / 3718 yd (not sure if that's normal, or maximum effective), and maximum is around 6500 yd.Can we discuss more about the main topic? What is the maximum range of a hellcat? What is the effective range of one of the rockets fired at the drone? Anyone know the serial numbers of the aircraft involved?
Stunned: They didn't have VT fuses in them?If I recall the range of the rockets typically was around 3400 m / 3718 yd (not sure if that's normal, or maximum effective), and maximum is around 6500 yd.
We need an emoji for "cringing in horror".
You would think that if they were shooting at a small, relatively slow moving, but erratic target, they might "bend" doctrine a bit and move in a little closer. (despite the risk from the Hellcat's turret gunners)The idea was that salvoing the rockets would make up for their relative inaccuracy. But if a direct hit was scored there was a pretty good chance of a kill.
Also, it was not intended to be used against fighter sized targets (although that is not an excuse for the failure during the Palmdale incident).
Ya know, I don't think I'd try to nudge any flying object with a tip tank full of JP4 and solid fueled rockets. Especially not in a so-called "fighter" that reputedly handles like an overweight UPS truck. I know they were later versions, but I've seen Firebees (flown remotely by enlisted Marines) best Topgun trained F4J pilots in ACM.Too bad they didn't teach the F-89 pilots the trick of putting their wingtip under the drone's wingtip and flipping it over, like WWII interceptors did with the V-1. Probably wouldn't have worked with an erratically flying drone, but it would have made a fitting end to the story.
PK of 2: both craft brought down by the contact.Too bad they didn't teach the F-89 pilots the trick of putting their wingtip under the drone's wingtip and flipping it over, like WWII interceptors did with the V-1. Probably wouldn't have worked with an erratically flying drone, but it would have made a fitting end to the story.