- Thread starter
-
- #41
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
5) Those assholes over at BMW who can't figure out a faster way to put a turbocharger on a 801.
2) Willie Messerschmitt - Now let's not get all sentimental. The Dr/Prof got so greedy that outright treason should be easy to prove.
On the Luftwaffe forum 12 O'clock High!, I found this interesting thread on the Fw 190A and turbo superchargers:
Focke-Wulf Fw 190A poor high-altitude performance - Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum
The information in this thread suggests the lack of effective turbo superchargers for the BMW radial engine was more complicated than simple neglect, such as Germany's lack of adequate metal alloys, and that turbo supercharger development for radial engines was laborious and tedious.
Source...? What units do these include, first line or second line or both?
What about servicibility rates?
Your figures seem to be largely incomplete on the Luftwaffe side.
As of 30 June 1943, the Luftwaffe had
1849 SE fighters (vs 1500 RAF fighters, which were largely composed of obsolate types btw),
554 night fighters (vs ca 570 RAF TE fighters, again mostly obsolate types),
1663 level bombers and 523 dive bombers and attack aircraft, ie. a total ca 2186 bomber types vs some 1300 RAF heavy, medium and light bombers.
Take note that several types are not included, ie. daylight Zestorer units, which had about 150 heavy fighters at this point.
The complete first line strenght of the Luftwaffe as of that date, not counting a large array of secondsry purpose planes (ie. liason, transport etc.) at this date was 7089 aircradft, not including secondary and reserve units. According to your data, the RAF at this point had about 3430 similiar combat types...
A more complete view on Luftwaffe strenght can be gleaned from the RLM strenght reports. These, as of July 1943, show the following strenght (both 1st and 2nd line units, but not including reserves):
Recon 1237
Bomber 2579
Stuka&Schlacht 975
Transport 908
Zerstörer (daylight TE F) 160
Nachtjagd 688
Tagjagd (daylight SEF) 2018
Grandtotal: 8565, incl. 2nd line units
Take a look at post nr 32. I explained briefly what Mtt was up to.Bronc-
Your assertion about Willi Messerschmitt piqued my curiousity, could you elaborate more on this? How did his greed lead to treasonous activity?
I've long had a dim view of Messerschmitt from the structural defects of the Bf 109F (inadequate bracing resulting in tail break-offs, wing crumpling) that resulted in midair disintegration and cost the lives of many Luftwaffe fighter pilots, including the aces Gustav Sprick and Wilhelm Balthasar, and generally flimsy construction of the Bf 109 series that rendered its pilots more vulnerable than necessary in combat situations and limited its development.
Thanks,
PG
German aircraft production during World War II - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Germany did not run out of aircraft. They produced over 35,000 during 1944, as many as 1942 and 1943 combined. As for fighters, they averaged over 1,000 Me-109s and over 600 Fw-190s per month during 1944.
The problem was fuel. The bottom fell out when the synthetic fuel plants were bombed during 1944. After 5 years of trying RAF Bomber Command finally managed to make a serious contribution to the allied war effort. Perhaps Germany was lulled into a false sense of security by the bombing failures of 1939 to 1943.
Not much you can do about that under wartime conditions. Other WWII equipment like the T-34 tank also had quality control problems. Not to mention aircraft like the P-38 and Me-210 which were rushed into mass production before the bugs were fixed.
To where? Germany cannot move factories to the other side of the Ural Mountains like Russia can or place aircraft orders in the U.S.A. like Britain can.
I agree but let me add a couple more elements.They may have had a lot of aeroplanes (because the manufacturers where under a lot of pressure to produce), but the quality and reliability really suffered as the war went on. In some cases "new" fighters had to be broken down and reassembled, just to make sure everything was proper. And frequently pilots felt unsure of the reliability of their new aeroplanes and it hampered their confidence in the air....sabotage was a common problem because of the practice of using "slave labor"...
That was a serious blunder. However there is another element to the story. RLM began funding for the Jumo222 engine at the same time the DB603 was halted. This was cutting edge stuff during 1936 to 1937. Nobody knew which engine proposals would work and which proposals would end on the scrap heap after absorbing lots of development money. For that matter nobody knew the DB600 program would produce the 1,850 hp DB605DB engine during 1944. Without the benefit of hindsight you examine the various engine proposals and make your best educated guess as to which proposals offer the most promise.Daimler Benz first proposes the DB 603 in September, 1936. (pg 12) The RLM halts development six months later and it's not until the end of 1939 that the RLM shows official interest again.
I don't think the C3 was all that much more difficult to produce than B4. I used to think so but it was merely a different thoughmore complex procedure. In the end the Germans didn't have more shortage of C3 than of B4.However Germany does need to increase production of high octane fuel for the DB605DB and to stockpile chromium for the Jumo004A.
Then why didn't the Luftwaffe switch entirely to C3 fuel by 1939?don't think the C3 was all that much more difficult to produce