What if the Americans never made any mistakes in their procurement decisions.

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Zeroes need to come low in so their cannons can be re-armed.
US aviators all coming at 15000 ft and higher also means F4Fs can provide more meaningful cover, all while US bomber force is up in numbers by 25%+-?
The USN at Midway proved to be incapable of coordinating strikes so I'm not sure the fighter cover would have been better. As to the increased numbers again it depends on timing. If they all come at once they can overwhelm the defense but the US was very poor at coordination at that time
 
The USN at Midway proved to be incapable of coordinating strikes so I'm not sure the fighter cover would have been better. As to the increased numbers again it depends on timing. If they all come at once they can overwhelm the defense but the US was very poor at coordination at that time
Even Stanhope Ring might take issue with that comment. :razz:
 
The USN at Midway proved to be incapable of coordinating strikes so I'm not sure the fighter cover would have been better. As to the increased numbers again it depends on timing. If they all come at once they can overwhelm the defense but the US was very poor at coordination at that time

Without torpedo bombers in the picture, there is only a need to escort dive bombers that were flying typically at same speed and at same altitude. When one not that good in doing something, having a bit easier job might help.
 
The USN at Midway proved to be incapable of coordinating strikes so I'm not sure the fighter cover would have been better.
This was, above all an issue of doctrine and command and control. The very concept of a large, multi carrier task force was kind of a new thing to USN, whose carriers had always operated in single carrier task groups.
Two task forces, commanded by two admirals, with one only nominally in charge, and air groups that had almost no experience (and no doctrine for) working together, kinda like the wild, wild west. We had no right to win that one, but the stars aligned in our favor.
Cheers,
Wes
 
This was, above all an issue of doctrine and command and control. The very concept of a large, multi carrier task force was kind of a new thing to USN, whose carriers had always operated in single carrier task groups.
Two task forces, commanded by two admirals, with one only nominally in charge, and air groups that had almost no experience (and no doctrine for) working together, kinda like the wild, wild west. We had no right to win that one, but the stars aligned in our favor.
Cheers,
Wes
But, first ya' gotta get it right.
Mitscher and the Mystery of Midway
Mitscher and Ring do not suffer scrutiny well.
 
The only possible mistake that I can see is:-
1. Not making any F5F Skyrockets.
2. Building the Buccaneer / Bermuda.
The only problem here is that if Skyrocket production is subcontracted to Brewster, its sure to be a failure.
3. Not enough Dominators built. I'd have used R-2800s without turbo superchargers to power it.

Any more ideas, guys?
I don't see these as mistakes, but mere rungs on the ladder. The F5F demonstrated what was possible for high rate of climb fighters, like Grumman's F8F.
 
I don't see these as mistakes, but mere rungs on the ladder. The F5F demonstrated what was possible for high rate of climb fighters, like Grumman's F8F.
I think you may have misread what he typed, I did the first time I read it. He is saying they made a mistake by not building the F5F Skyrocket, I agree with that as well.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back