Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Without the A-6 Harvard there also is no client customer relationship between NAA and the RAF, so the Mustang / P-51 becomes an even bigger leap into the unknown.Very under-appreciated, without them you have no pilots, and no combat at all. Plenty of British pilots were trained in USAAF schools too (or at least US civil schools which were later certified by the USAAF to provide basic military instruction).
View attachment 755258
Agree.Ship the UKR a few thousand cheap V-1's and let them drive the Russians nuts
Well, obviously equip some with GPS guidance and UAV style remote control. But I think at least half of them would have no ordnance at all on board and perhaps have reflective structures designed to make them look much bigger on radar along with extra fuel. Let them cruise East at 5000 to 10000 ft at 400 kts and let the Russians try to figure out if they are worth intercepting.What can we think of to better this one?
SBD-3 Dauntless dive bomber
A lot of people seemed to agree. Originally designed by Northrop, and called the BT-1, Douglas took the basic idea further. Meanwhile, just down El Segundo Blvd from Northrop, NAA was building trainers that looked awful darn similar, including a Basic Combat aircraft that used not only the same layout but the same engine, and was dubbed the A-27 when the USAAF unexpectedly ended up with some. So at one time there were three factories in the same area all building airplanes that you almost needed a maintenance manual to tell which was which.The SBD is what planes should look like.
I like, but the Dauntless is hardly underappreciated, as per the thread title. It's famous for its record of cracking carriers. Underappreciated dive-bombers, I'd say Vengeance, Skua and Barracuda. IIRC, the Skua scored the first British aerial kill of WW2 and was the first dive-bomber to sink a cruiser.SBD-3 Dauntless dive bomber
Indeed! After all, I recently bought a DVD of a Major Motion Picture entitled "Dauntless." How many other WWII airplanes have receive that treatment? "Memphis Belle?" although that is the name of a specific one.but the Dauntless is hardly underappreciated,
I love yellow wings and I'm not the first here to say it.A lot of people seemed to agree. Originally designed by Northrop, and called the BT-1, Douglas took the basic idea further. Meanwhile, just down El Segundo Blvd from Northrop, NAA was building trainers that looked awful darn similar, including a Basic Combat aircraft that used not only the same layout but the same engine, and was dubbed the A-27 when the USAAF unexpectedly ended up with some. So at one time there were three factories in the same area all building airplanes that you almost needed a maintenance manual to tell which was which.
View attachment 755756
BT-1 was built by Northrop Corp. which was a subsidiary of Douglas Aircraft and in 1937 became Douglas El Segundo Division. Jack Northrop left in 1939 and formed Northrop Aircraft Inc.A lot of people seemed to agree. Originally designed by Northrop, and called the BT-1, Douglas took the basic idea further. Meanwhile, just down El Segundo Blvd from Northrop, NAA was building trainers that looked awful darn similar, including a Basic Combat aircraft that used not only the same layout but the same engine, and was dubbed the A-27 when the USAAF unexpectedly ended up with some. So at one time there were three factories in the same area all building airplanes that you almost needed a maintenance manual to tell which was which.
View attachment 755756View attachment 755757View attachment 755758
The prettiest yellow winged airplane was this one.I love yellow wings and I'm not the first here to say it.
It's interesting to learn Naugahyde was in existence in 1944.