What was the One Thing that won WWII?

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

the lancaster was our best bomber, MAYBE if there was a griffon engined mossie it may be able to carry 9,000lbs over a very short range, but i doubt it....................
 
I would think that even if the Mossie could be modified to handle the weight of an atomic weapon the physical sized of the bomb would cause serious difficulty. It was tough enough getting a 4000lb bomb into the Mossie's bomb bay.
 
Disagree there LG - The Mossie bomber-variant was adapted as early as possible to take the 4,000 lb. 'cookie', hence the bulged-bomb bays....And les, we wrangled this bit about 'Britain and the A-bomb' earlier on...British scientists were involved from the beginning with the A-bomb, it was decided to build it the US, partly because of better facilities, and also security...there is quite alot of historical reading to get the full picture, but that's the facts of it....
 
I think you may have misunderstood my point Gemhorse. I know the modifications to the allow the Mossie to carry the 'cookie' was done rather early. My point was that the bomb bay had to be buldged considerably to fit a 4,000lb weapon. Where would a 9,000-10,000lb bomb go?
 
An earthquake nuke would have been even heavier . . . possibly even larger than the 22,000lb Grand Slam. With the Grand Slam, the ceiling of the Lanc was fairly low. Even clean it was still considerably slower than the B-29 and the Superfort had to push it to clear the blast radius.
 
Can somebody clarify the term "earthquake bomb" to a newbie like me, please ? I always thought there were only two types of bombs : the "normal bombs" and the A-bombs.
Click to expand...

The Earthquake bomb was so called because it weighed in at 22,000lbs, and when it was dropped it penetrated into the gound before expolding, and created a local earthquake, which was enough to cause Railway Viaducts to shake themselves to pieces, or even colapse railway tunnels with trains in them.

Tha Lancaster was the only Allied Bomber used in the European Theatre that was capable of carrying it, although the B25 was more than capable of Carrying the Earthquake Bomb, I don't think it did until just after the war.

It was one of three bombs developed by Barnes Wallis
The Bouncing Bomb
The 12,000lb Tallboy
And The 22,0000lb Earthquake or Sometimes Known as the Grand Slam

 
I believe you mean the B-29, but yes it was tested post-war carrying a Grand Slam under each wing.

But there is another thing I've been thinking about. I'm not sure an "earth-quake nuke" would be all that effective. Much of the damage caused by an atomic weapon is caused by the massive presure waves it produces. It seems to be that denonating it below ground would degrade its effectiveness considerably.
 
but yes it was tested post-war carrying a Grand Slam under each wing
Click to expand...

not even the B-29 could carry that, it could carry 1xgrand slam, or 2xtallboys, one under each wing................

and the tallboy was also a earthquake bomb, earthquake bomb wasn't a name for the grand slam, it was the type of bomb...............
 
Lanc,

"Early summer 1945, three Boeing B-29s were modified to carry a 22,000 lb Grand Slam on external bomb racks under each wing between the inboard engine and fuselage. After experiments at Eglin AAF in Florida, an order for fifty modified aircraft was placed. If the war hadn't ended with the dropping of the atom bombs, dual Grand Slam B-29s might have been available to see action over Japan by the first week of September. Postwar publicity photographs never show more than three of the dual bomb modified B-29s flying in a formation. That may have been all that were built. Another B-29 was modified so that the lower part of the double bomb bay section would permit the semi external carriage of one large bomb (Tallboy, Grand Slam or T-12)."
 

Attachments

  • b29withdualtallboyinstallationdetail2_187.jpg
    30.7 KB · Views: 299
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

G
Looking for a WWII aircraft prop
Replies
0
Views
2K
Grounded
G
F
  • Locked
were the tuskegee airmen the most skilled pilots in the war?
2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
19K
FLYBOYJ
L
  • Locked
What Criteria should be used for determining the best land based piston fighter
9 10 11
Replies
218
Views
24K
Lighthunmust
L
  • Locked
The Battle Of Kursk - the air battle
3 4 5
Replies
88
Views
29K
parsifal
J
Romanian Aeronautics in the Second World War 1941-1945
Replies
0
Views
4K
Jjr
J
Menu
Log in
Register