What Was the worst Aircraft of WWII?

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

and the swordfish wasn't a WWI plane at all, and to give you some idea of the skill involved, at some points they were flying so low that the AA guns COULDN'T be depressed far enough to hit them, and no planes were lost during the attack, however 4 chrased on landing...................
 
109s and 190s both being very good aircraft, so you can't blame the Spitfires for having a hard time.
 
I think the point was, in the face of fighter oposition, the Swordfish wasn't nearly as effective.
 
:lol:

what do you expect, even their Spitfire escorts got mauled by Dolfo's gang of 109's and 190's!

that's becuase the spits were flying as escort, when you have to stick to whatever it is you're escorting you loose everything important in winning a dogfight, just look at the 109s that had to stick to the bombers during the BoB...................
 
The 109s were in a stupid escort position on their escorts, they couldn't save the bombers. On top of that, Spitfires are better.
 
The idea behind the close escort the 109s flew during the BoB (and that the 8th AF used initially) was that you forced the enemy fighters to fly through your fighters to get to your bombers. However, it also prevented your fighters from acting agressively as they were shields and not swords.
 
Thank you, for pointing out the obvious. The dogfights happened around the bomber formations so the bombers were still in the firing line. Have you got any idea why the 8th AF did it, even though the Germans had failed so horribly?

GrG, the Spitfire was better than the 109. It's like the nice curves were better than the flat. :lol:
 
I was refering to the Spitfire and 109, along with women. It must have flew straight over you. :lol:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back