What was the worst Aircraft of WWII?

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

There is no doubt in my mind that the Italians made the best looking planes! the Fiat G.50, P-108, Cr.42, SM.79 and Mc.202 were some of the best looking planes of WW2

8)
 
uh oh, i knew i shouldnt have left you 2 bickering.....

Well I dont think that we are bickering, simply putting our points across in a rather childish way as one does when one can acknowledge one is pissed off but not too pissed off to say it outright! Comprende?
 
There is no doubt in my mind that the Italians made the best looking planes! the Fiat G.50, P-108, Cr.42, SM.79 and Mc.202 were some of the best looking planes of WW2

thanks, i agree entirely, though i think the best looking plane was the hurricane 8)
 
My pick for worst aircraft of WW2 goes to the Douglas TBD Devastator, one of the most mis-named aircraft of the entire war! This dog of a torpedo bomber was decimated at the Battle of Midway, with 36 of 41 planes being shot down by Japanese Zeroes.
 
I agree the Devastator wasn't a very hot aircraft BUT it was pitted against one of the top airforces during the entire war with truly first class fighters and good pilots - Alot of American Navy aircraft suffered (the Dauntless and the Avenger had their fair share of defeats) because of what they had to face - the Devastator did have some sucess in the battle of Coral Sea in 1942 - I think it was a pretty crap aircraft but i don't think it rates as the worse... :shock:
 
because it has no speed
the stuka survived the whole war although it was slow
or because it is unreliable
typhoon engines usually only lasted 20 hours but it was the greatest allied tankbuster
because it cant carry much arms
the ju-88 wasnt the greatest bomber but it was still the most versatile aircraft of the war
it may not have much distance
Bf-109:an essence of how untrue that is in itself and how it can be worked around

so what im getting at here is that there is no ONE reason a plane sucks(usually). there are usually a lot or one killing deficiency that is unfixable but hey they worked around the one-o-nine's range and other problems in other planes so its pretty much a HUGE problem or many small to medium sized ones that ruin a plane

Reichsmarschall Batista
 
I just reckon its a great aircraft. although it is a german plane i think that the aircraft and the crews deserve some recognistion!
 
jj1982 said:
I just reckon its a great aircraft. although it is a german plane i think that the aircraft and the crews deserve some recognistion!

What so suddenly convinced you its such a bloody marvellous aircraft?? it wasn't THAT good...and i tell you another thing anyone who thinks the JU88 is better looking than a DH Mosquito needs their eyes testing!

:bluepirate:
 
PS. Yes the Vulture engines were Rolls-Royce, and my vote for worst aircraft of the war goes to the Vought Vindicator - the last plane I would procure for my airforce if I had to cover all the necessary wartime roles. There is nothing the Vindicator does well that nothing else does better. For the same reason, the Brewster Buffalo is my second vote. It's success in Finland was largely due to the poor Russian training and equipment in the early-war stages, and the plane is hideously over-modelled in FB.
 
although it is a german plane
wtf do you mean "although"?!?!?!?!?! dont make me fight for the meaning of me name!!!!!!!!!!!! germans had the best planes!! not always for every reason (cough, cough stuka speed) (cough, cough Bf-109 range) (cough, cough Bf-110 vulnerabilty) but they had the best planes and best pilots! how dare you doubt german planes! they arent alwasy the best looking but in longevity and excelling in at least one area above the rest they rightfully deserve to be called the best!

Reichsmarschall Batista
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back