Which aircraft could be adapted easier for long range naval recon: Do19 or Ju89?

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules


While its an interesting project - mentioned, btw, in Robert Forsyth Eddie J Creek's book on the Me 264 Messerschmitt Me 264 Amerikabomber: The Luftwaffe's Lost Transatlantic Bomber: Robert Forsyth, Eddie J. Creek: 9781903223659: - all of the figures have to be estimates of its performance, with no evidence that the projected figures would have been achieved once the aircraft was in operational service. For a start, with DB 601s, the projected range would have been drastically reduced, while the airframe would have to be beefed up to take the longer, heavier engines. There's no mention as to whether armour was fitted for the crew, nor what the "considerable armament" was supposed to be. By the time all of the necessary operational equipment was fitted, along with the new, more powerful engines, it would not have been able to cover both seaboards of the Atlantic. While there was supposedly huge growth potential is there any concrete evidence of that?

Nor is there any mention of where the raw materials for its production were meant to come from, or the large numbers of extra engines it would have needed - while the He 111 might have been sacrificed, there were not even enough DB 601s available to power more than a small sub-series of the He 111, meaning that the Jumo 211 would have had to be used, meaning that (probably) the Ju 88 would have been either delayed or sacrificed. Chances are it would have only been slightly faster than the He 111, while it's operating height of 6,500 metres would have still left it vulnerable to the RAF's fighters.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
One also has to wonder about the comparison with the He 116.

A 3-4 seat mailplane. No guns, cruising speeds 30-50mph lower than the He 111 and the "mission" to Japan took over 54 hours of flying time (one way) but 6 days. A good performance for a 15,000lb 900-1000hp aircraft but hardly the basis for any sort of bomber.
 
Nothing Germany can do about that if they wait until 1935 to start rearmament. It takes time to build a military-industrial complex from scratch.

Boy, those Germans worked like busy beavers from 1935, creating an entire arms industry from nothing; it's air force, the Luftwaffe comprised almost solely of airliners and what could Britain do to counter the German threat to its civilian air routes? With her desperate shortage of aluminium the Hurricane and Mosquito had to be made of wood.
 
For a reality check on the "banana" bomber one could look at the Boeing XB-15. It could NOT do what was claimed for the banana bomber. It could barely fly ONE WAY 3400 miles with a 2000lb bomb load, let alone return. IF the speed was 320kph and NOT 320Kts it might be a a bit more believable but then you have the phrase " yet most contemporary German bombers could barely manage half the same speed." Contemporary German bombers could only do 160KPH?

Even a Do 11 could hit 260kph.



This was one of those aircraft that the German busy beavers (with the aid of time machines) had built and in service in 1933-34 after starting in 1935
 

320kts is about 370mph/595kph.
That's a lot faster than the contemporary fighters of the day.
There's a mistake in there somewhere, I think 320kph is more likely (320kph is about 200mph/172kts).

There's no way that plane was a 370mph/595kph bomber....on Jumo 210's?
 

Users who are viewing this thread