Sep 2, 2005 #21 cheddar cheese Major General 20,259 21 Jan 9, 2004 WSM, England I agree with all of that wmaxt, except Tornado and Tempest. Tornados really arent good.
Sep 3, 2005 #22 Archangel Airman 1st Class 134 0 Dec 20, 2004 NL im still thinking about the P38L and the eurofighter. both are rally fasr interceptors. (and can be used for other missions )
im still thinking about the P38L and the eurofighter. both are rally fasr interceptors. (and can be used for other missions )
Sep 3, 2005 #23 cheddar cheese Major General 20,259 21 Jan 9, 2004 WSM, England Nah I think wmaxt's link with the P-38 to the F-15E was spot on 8) The Eurofighter is advanced though, as was the P-38 65 years ago.
Nah I think wmaxt's link with the P-38 to the F-15E was spot on 8) The Eurofighter is advanced though, as was the P-38 65 years ago.
Sep 3, 2005 #24 mosquitoman Master Sergeant 2,979 16 Jan 20, 2005 Saffron Walden/Sheffield www.myspace.com Hows about Eurofighter and Me262 Both highly advanced for their time but in short supply
Sep 3, 2005 #25 wmaxt Staff Sergeant 1,200 11 Dec 5, 2004 Boise, Idaho Thanks, How about this one F-111 - Mossie Bomber/fighter low or high for those jobs brute force just doesn't cut it. wmaxt
Thanks, How about this one F-111 - Mossie Bomber/fighter low or high for those jobs brute force just doesn't cut it. wmaxt
Sep 3, 2005 #27 FLYBOYJ "THE GREAT GAZOO" 28,075 8,761 Apr 9, 2005 Colorado, USA I would put the mossie to the F-111 - My father in law told me the F-111 would just continue to build up speed until it started to self-destruct!
I would put the mossie to the F-111 - My father in law told me the F-111 would just continue to build up speed until it started to self-destruct!
Sep 3, 2005 #28 mosquitoman Master Sergeant 2,979 16 Jan 20, 2005 Saffron Walden/Sheffield www.myspace.com I thought the Canberra was a better match with the Mossie- both unarmed bombers, photo-recce, sleek lines, 2 engines
I thought the Canberra was a better match with the Mossie- both unarmed bombers, photo-recce, sleek lines, 2 engines
Sep 3, 2005 #29 FLYBOYJ "THE GREAT GAZOO" 28,075 8,761 Apr 9, 2005 Colorado, USA mosquitoman said: I thought the Canberra was a better match with the Mossie- both unarmed bombers, photo-recce, sleek lines, 2 engines Click to expand... Now that makes sense!
mosquitoman said: I thought the Canberra was a better match with the Mossie- both unarmed bombers, photo-recce, sleek lines, 2 engines Click to expand... Now that makes sense!
Sep 3, 2005 #30 mosquitoman Master Sergeant 2,979 16 Jan 20, 2005 Saffron Walden/Sheffield www.myspace.com I made sense? First time for everything
Sep 3, 2005 #31 Nonskimmer Captain 8,611 9 Nov 11, 2004 Halifax, Nova Scotia Don't let it go to your head.
Sep 4, 2005 #32 mosquitoman Master Sergeant 2,979 16 Jan 20, 2005 Saffron Walden/Sheffield www.myspace.com Don't worry, I won't B-29 and B-52: Both have the word fortress in their names, made by the same company, both very heavy bombers
Don't worry, I won't B-29 and B-52: Both have the word fortress in their names, made by the same company, both very heavy bombers
Sep 4, 2005 #33 wmaxt Staff Sergeant 1,200 11 Dec 5, 2004 Boise, Idaho mosquitoman said: B-29 and B-52: Both have the word fortress in their names, made by the same company, both very heavy bombers Click to expand... That works, I was thinking B-1 and B-29 because they both are the heavest, advanced, 4 engined and fastest of their day. wmaxt
mosquitoman said: B-29 and B-52: Both have the word fortress in their names, made by the same company, both very heavy bombers Click to expand... That works, I was thinking B-1 and B-29 because they both are the heavest, advanced, 4 engined and fastest of their day. wmaxt
Sep 5, 2005 #35 cheddar cheese Major General 20,259 21 Jan 9, 2004 WSM, England Other than the Tactical Strike and Reconnaisaince bit I dunno..I dont really see a link. I think the TSR-2 would be better suited to something that perhaps didnt see service...
Other than the Tactical Strike and Reconnaisaince bit I dunno..I dont really see a link. I think the TSR-2 would be better suited to something that perhaps didnt see service...
Sep 5, 2005 #36 jrk Airman 1st Class 264 1 Jul 26, 2005 staffordshire hawker typhoon and sepecat jaguar both had good ground attack capabilities. and handley page halifax and avro vulcan both carried large bomb loads and both had long range capabilities.
hawker typhoon and sepecat jaguar both had good ground attack capabilities. and handley page halifax and avro vulcan both carried large bomb loads and both had long range capabilities.
Sep 5, 2005 #37 cheddar cheese Major General 20,259 21 Jan 9, 2004 WSM, England I suppose you could compare the V-bombers to the British heavies. Valiant - Lancaster Vulcan - Halifax Victor - Stirling
I suppose you could compare the V-bombers to the British heavies. Valiant - Lancaster Vulcan - Halifax Victor - Stirling
Sep 5, 2005 #38 mosquitoman Master Sergeant 2,979 16 Jan 20, 2005 Saffron Walden/Sheffield www.myspace.com I'd put the Vulcan with the Lanc, mainly because they were both made by Avro
Sep 15, 2005 #40 P38 Pilot Tech Sergeant 1,534 6 Jun 19, 2005 Auburn,Alabama; USA How about this one: The Mossie to SR-71. Both served as spy planes, The Mossie was unarmed at one point and the SR-71 was always unarmed. Both were also pretty fast for their days.
How about this one: The Mossie to SR-71. Both served as spy planes, The Mossie was unarmed at one point and the SR-71 was always unarmed. Both were also pretty fast for their days.