Why no Fw 190H but the Ta 152H? (6 Viewers)

[Engineman]

Look at the image I posted in the previous image - the Ta 152H used a NACA 230xx airfoil at the root. The NACA 5-digit airfoils have very little laminar flow.

Hi,

Thanks for that original data page. The Ta 152 H-1 profile seems to indicate both "NACA 230" and Fw in the box, which is different to all the other types shown. Given the very different detail of the 152 H high aspect ratio wing, is it not likely that this shows a root area NACA 230 profile, developing into an unspecified Fw profile in the very different outer sections?

Cheers

Eng

 

[Reluctant Poster]

FWIW, weight of the wing assembly on the Fw 190A8 was 475 kg.

Each or total.

 

[tomo pauk]

Each or total.

Total, per aircraft.

 

[Engineman]

Each or total.

You would think total, guided by the fact that the 190 wings were built as one unit with a carry-through spar without break-points and, 3 men can carry a single Bf 109 G wing, which come as separate L and R wings.

Eng

 

[Reluctant Poster]

From "The Focke Wulf Ta 152" by Hitchcock:
"Steel had long been planned for both the Fw 190 and the Ta 152; specifically for use in the wing spars and skinning despite a 15 to 25 percent weight penalty. "
Since the paragraph it is taken from is a discussion of the wing design I presume it is 15 to 25 percent of the total wing weight, not the entire aircraft.
250 kg would equate to a wing weight of 1000 to 1700 kg. I can't find any info on the wing weights but it doesn't seem reasonable to me.

"Focke Wulf Ta 152" by Dieter Harmann gives a breakdown of weights for the Ta 152 H-0 and H-1.

I was interrupted before I could give the weights . Here they are

I used goggle translate for the English names so please correct as needed.