"Why the P-47 Thunderbolt, a World War II Beast of the Airways, Ruled the Skies" Smithsonian Magazine

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Is the comparison of the Mosquito v. B-17 a separate thread or part of a thread derailment? I was about to look it up but, again, I hit the reply button.
There's a lot of good information there about why the Mosquito couldn't replace the B-17. Some of that information is probably applicable to the P-47.
100% correct! Folks tend to read aircraft specs gained from second hand sources and assume the aircraft can deliver best speed, altitude, range and payload all the time.
 
100% correct! Folks tend to read aircraft specs gained from second hand sources and assume the aircraft can deliver best speed, altitude, range and payload all the time.
And with regards to time, specs are always quoted for the later versions. The first P-47s to arrive in UK werent going to drop bombs anywhere in Germany, they could just to say escort B-17s to the German border.
 
Yeah, I remember that guy in the Mossie versus B-17 thread - aparently the Allies wasted all that money and time on B-17s and Lancs when a Mossie could pack a 4,000 pound load all the way to Berlin and put it in the Reichs Chancellery's mailbox...
However if you change the discussion to ... "Why didnt the British make lots of Mosquitos instead of Short Stirlings" it would be a short discussion, because they did. The Stirling was useless and so phased out before it was phased in. The reason is simple, the B-17 was a good aircraft and those in charge werent fools, the Stirling was a heavy bomber, it was just heavy, no other redeeming feature and that was quickly noted by those in charge.
 
the Stirling was a heavy bomber, it was just heavy, no other redeeming feature and that was quickly noted by those in charge.

Not true.............................As a redeeming feature in had more internal volume than any other bomber before the B-29

interior-short-stirling-1945-1568255.jpg.webp


Oh,,,,,, You meant redeeming feature as a bomber..........................

Nevermind
 
I'm sure Superfire would approve. It's what the U.S. should have been doing in early 1942.
 
Comparing a B-17 to a P-47? Apples and oranges, of course.

In any event, if I'd had my choice of what plane to fly in WWII, I would still pick the Jug, pretty much because it could take punishment and fly you home. .
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back