WW2 and Airplanes of today and Air tactics

• Aug 13, 2004

• #141

M

MP-Willow

Staff Sergeant

894

2

Jan 16, 2004

Saco, MAINE!!!!

Interesting. If you want B-17 look for the airworthy ones like EAA. That keeps things a little more reasonable.

I used that site for some Seaplanes that I am looking at. Not but.

 

• Aug 13, 2004

• #142

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,937

17

Dec 20, 2003

i don't really look for much info on google, like you say, it takes ages to ge through it all.......................

 

• Aug 15, 2004

• #143

M

MP-Willow

Staff Sergeant

894

2

Jan 16, 2004

Saco, MAINE!!!!

Yes, but the fun side trips I have gone on are very interesting.

 

• Aug 15, 2004

• #144

lesofprimus

Brigadier General

18,831

47

Jul 27, 2004

Long Island Native in Mississippi

ihatemeatballs.com

I agree MP... I have learned more from those side trips than i have from the original search... Pretty interesting theory actually lol....

 

• Aug 16, 2004

• #145

MichaelHenley

Senior Airman

506

0

Jul 25, 2004

Brisbane

spaces.msn.com

Hey- To save you lot the trouble of dying before finishing the list, there's already one out there - WINGS PALLET (http://wp.scn.ru). It's in both english and russian, and contains ZILLIONS of fighters, bombers, etc. From WWI to the Present.

 

• Aug 16, 2004

• #146

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,937

17

Dec 20, 2003

whatever you do don't go to TG planes, the info's all rubbish...............

 

• Aug 17, 2004

• #147

MichaelHenley

Senior Airman

506

0

Jul 25, 2004

Brisbane

spaces.msn.com

TG? Whats TG??

 

• Aug 17, 2004

• #148

lesofprimus

Brigadier General

18,831

47

Jul 27, 2004

Long Island Native in Mississippi

ihatemeatballs.com

Its a BS web site... Bogus....

 

• Aug 17, 2004

• #149

MichaelHenley

Senior Airman

506

0

Jul 25, 2004

Brisbane

spaces.msn.com

Have you tried it my link yet? What do you think?

 

• Aug 17, 2004

• #150

S

Sagaris

Airman

51

0

Aug 9, 2004

I've encountered that site before, I have found it useful in the past.

 

• Aug 17, 2004

• #151

M

MP-Willow

Staff Sergeant

894

2

Jan 16, 2004

Saco, MAINE!!!!

Les I have read it and like what i have found for some aircraft and the people on the forum are not that bad.

MH -what link? nice pic for the sig even if it is a B-17

 

• Aug 18, 2004

• #152

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,937

17

Dec 20, 2003

the pic sucks!! the colours make it physically hurt to look at!!

 

• Aug 18, 2004

• #153

MichaelHenley

Senior Airman

506

0

Jul 25, 2004

Brisbane

spaces.msn.com

Oi! Don't shot me down in flames again...

 

• Aug 19, 2004

• #154

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,937

17

Dec 20, 2003

it's true!! change it!!

 

• Aug 19, 2004

• #155

M

MP-Willow

Staff Sergeant

894

2

Jan 16, 2004

Saco, MAINE!!!!

He can keep it if He wishes, it is his sig! But if you want a B-17 there are better shots.

 

• Aug 20, 2004

• #156

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,937

17

Dec 20, 2003

he can't keep it if it hurts to look at!!

 

• Aug 20, 2004

• #157

S

Sagaris

Airman

51

0

Aug 9, 2004

Here's the irony, it doesnt.

 

• Aug 21, 2004

• #158

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,937

17

Dec 20, 2003

it does..............

 

• Aug 21, 2004

• #159

cheddar cheese

Major General

20,265

21

Jan 9, 2004

WSM, England

it doesnt....

 

• Aug 21, 2004

• #160

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,937

17

Dec 20, 2003

it does..................

and the dots are my "thing" that i do, you can't use them................