A rational approach to debates and 'best' arguments...?

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Wouldn't it be great if they made a nice dark German lager named something like Fw190?

Sturtzkamfflugzeug sounds like a good name for a hearty ale - "nothing goes down steeper", or Zerstorer, 17 percent proof strong German lager "a squadron of these and you'll be well and truly shot down..."
 
As long as everyone understands that there cannot be one single correct answer that applies universally, I've no problem with "best" arguments. Opinion and perception will always play a role, and although I appreciate folks who provide performance figures and the like, the relevance of these can legitimately be questioned when balanced against such less quantifable factors such as presumed reliability, differing degrees of workmanship, and suitability to specific operational conditions.
 
What can I say? People like Beer and ale!


View attachment 221589


And no, not everyone recognizes that there is no single "best." After reading the posts in this forum, I think that would be apparent ... perhaps not. Some people have a "favorite" and it is the "best" for EVERYTHING. There are people in here that believe the Mosquito was best at everything; the Bf / Me 109 was best at everything; the Spitfire was best at everything; the Fw 190 was best at everything ... etc. There is at least ONE guy who believes the Buffalo was best fighter! Go figure ...

I believe I'll have another beer.
 

Users who are viewing this thread