A6M - Germany Japan Technology Exchange Missed Opportunity?

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Greetings GrauGeist,

I don't disagree with you. Thinking about how this thread started, I was struck by the possibility that the LW had opportunities to develop a fighter that would have been capable enough to fill the role needed during the BoB for long range escort and air superiority. My thought was that design knowledge could have come from Japan given the development of the Zero, but I was unaware of the capabilities of the He112 as you have referenced which also demonstrates that this knowledge was possibly closer at hand. I think your point that "the RLM was either oblivious to, or not interested in" is spot on.

Thanks for your comments.

Kk
 
Last edited:
NevadaK said:
Greetings All,
Your thoughts?
Click to expand...

Germany was limited principally by:

1) Lack of critical metal alloying elements
2) Lack of fuel
3) Poor strategic planning
4) Terrible technological and scientific management
5) A reliance on imported-foreign/forced labour

Licensing foreign designs would potentially circumvent (but not solve) #3 & 4 in the very short term. Thats about it.

Winning the war would have involved solving #3 & 4 in the mid 30`s, then planning your way around #1,2 & 5.

Japanese engineers did a good job of managing their own moderately similar situation, importing their solutions to their own problems
does not solve Germany`s issues... much as I do like Japanese WW2 aviation stuffs: (Zero engine)

 
Last edited:
Its an understandable temptation in this forum to concentrate on aircraft but I feel the biggest advantage to be gained by the Japanese was on the ground. Equipping the Japanese Army with the simple MP40 and Panzerfaust would have made a huge difference in the close range jungle warfare of the Far East. Again on land, the Germans were world leaders in the training and use of infantry and in many ways the Far East was an infantry war.

There is little point trying to transfer technologies that the Japanese didn't have the ability and/or infrastructure to build or maintain. The difficulty that the Japanese had in trying to copy the 40mm Bofors captured from the British is evidence of that.

The other significant gain would be in training. The Luftwaffe in the first half of the war were comfortably ahead of the rest of the world in the use of the finger four tactics, at sea the use of Submarines against merchant and support vessels as well as the use of the Wolf Pack at sea could easily have had significant success in the vast spaces of the Pacific. Can you imagine the impact on the USA if the second German submarine assault known as the 'Second Happy Time' had been co-ordinated with an attack on the West Coast by Japanese Submarine's?
 
The Japanese had plenty of naval experience which the Germans didn't have. So torpedoes and carrier experience would have been good swap.

The question is the BF 109 is much faster than the Zero in the 1940 time frame. So based purely as an interceptor then why choose slower?

Long range is sorted by the Me 110.

Japanese did have smg but it wasn't built in numbers.

The tripartite pact was not signed until September 1940 so any Zero transfer would happen after that event so nah. Why have Zeroes when you can have Fw 190?

The only reason to take on Zeroes would be for the Graf Zeppelin and thats not a bad shout.
 
Had Japan just waited
That's a seriously big casting.
 
Hey NevadaK,

re: Japanese aviation fuel quality

Somewhere in the DTIC intelligence reports there is mention that the IJAF (in particular) and land based IJN units had problems with getting enough of the higher quality fuel supplies out to the islands. It is not that the Japanese did not have high grade (at least 93-100 octane) it was more a problem with getting it to the front. Between the US aircraft and submarines, the supply problem became quite serious, earlier than most people realize. It became bad enough that in order to have enough fuel to operate, the air units would blend lower grade (~motor pool) fuel with the available aviation stocks, reducing the performance number. And due to the reduced performance number, the air units sometimes had to modify the engines to allow their operation on the lower grade fuel. I have never seen specific examples of what was actually done to the engines, but this is a known work-around, and it was mentioned 'frequently' by some of the Japanese soldiers/officers/pilots during the post-war debriefs.
 
The Basket said:
The tripartite pact was not signed until September 1940 so any Zero transfer would happen after that event so nah.
Click to expand...

So you would think, however (just for example) Daimler-Benz had begun making their own signed agreements with the Japanese regardling licence building of the DB 601 in Japan as early as October 1937. (see Chapter 2, Reference #220 in my book).
 
Germans sold their own grandmothers for a quick buck.
Don't mean Japanese did.

Time frame is all wrong. Germans got 109F and Fw 190 and Me 210 by 1940 in the pipeline and you want to sell them a very slow week old egg sandwich? When will the Zero be ready for mass production? 1943? A 335mph fighter in 1943?

You don't like the Luftwaffe much!
 

Shinpachi - could you please chime in with regards to actual stocks % of aviation fuel (87 oct, 91/92 oct etc) in warehuses and/or at remote locations?
 

A normal human being would have said: "Oh, thanks I didnt realise the technology exchange had begun years before the signing of the Tripartite act".
 
The Basket said:
The exchange happened in ww1 when German colonies became Japanese.

I ain't normal and I don't say thanks to you.
Click to expand...

Well thats clearly rubbish as earlier you said nothing could have happened before 1940 because of the Triparate act. So actually
your just desperately backpedalling because your upset someone corrected you.

Secondly, you cant just say "I`m not normal" as a disclaimer then proceed to be rude and behave like a 12 year old brat.

Embarrasing. But regardless of your refusal to act with any decorum - I WILL thank YOU .. for reminding me why I keep promsing
myself to never bother contributing to forums.
 
I still say if there's anything Germany can use from Japan it's naval aviation. Order an aircraft carrier from a Japanese yard, along with aircraft. Germany has already violated all its treaty obligations, so one more won't matter. This is how Germany gets its A6M Zeros.

1936, Germany secretly orders a second unit of Japan's Hiryu class. The ship is completed in June 1939, and sails with a Japanese crew on an apparent good will visit to Germany. Ship is transferred to the German navy. A5M will be swapped for A6M in 1941-42.

Of course the more exciting version of this is Germany's carrier isn't completed until 1940 or 1941, and now Germany needs to get past the RN to get it home. This carrier would have A6M onboard.
 
Last edited:
Snowygrouch said:
...

Embarrasing. But regardless of your refusal to act with any decorum - I WILL thank YOU .. for reminding me why I keep promsing
myself to never bother contributing to forums.
Click to expand...

Calum, FWIW - there is a lot of forum members that appreciate your input, myself included.

There is always the 'ignore member' option to smooth things out. Worked for me flawlessly.
 
Are you asking me out on a date? I am married but a nice meal and a glass of wine and who knows where it may lead.
 
tomo pauk said:
Calum, FWIW - there is a lot of forum members that appreciate your input, myself included.

There is always the 'ignore member' option to smooth things out. Worked for me flawlessly.
Click to expand...
Hahaha.
What laugh. Can you confirm me a time when the Japanese did any transfer of technology to Germany before the Tripartite pact.

I know what you mean as I ignore you at every opportunity too.
 
The Basket said:
Hahaha.
What laugh. Can you confirm me a time when the Japanese did any transfer of technology to Germany before the Tripartite pact.

I know what you mean as I ignore you at every opportunity too.
Click to expand...
Japan has no technology the Germans would want. You need demand as well as supply.

Maybe Long Lance torpedoes? The Germans might like to see the Kaidai-type submarine submarines?
 
We you see Giving the Zero to Germany is the Japanese transferring technology to Germany.

Not Germany transferring technology to Japan. Although there is plenty of evidence of Japan having examples of the latest German fighters.

The Molotov Ribbentrop pact was quite a shock to the Japanese as Germany has an alliance with Japans greatest enemy. Also IJN secrecy was very tight so highly unlikely to offer any tech.

The Japanese accepted any tech from anywhere if it benefited them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

Z
Air cooled inline engines - a missed opportunity?
2 3
Replies
41
Views
5K
Shortround6
S
Z
Germany goes for centrifugal flow turbojet engines?
2 3 4
Replies
71
Views
2K
bf109xxl
Upper Limits of Imperial Japanese Aerospace Technology
2
Replies
22
Views
2K
JoblinTheGoblin
A
If Weimar Republic succeeds, is Britain unprepared to face Japan?
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
Shortround6
S
Radial engines more favored in Germany, 1935-45?
6 7 8
Replies
146
Views
13K
tomo pauk
Menu
Log in
Register