Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
IIRC, weren't there cases of strafing aircraft shooting themselves down? Bullets ricocheting off the ground, and back into the air, and the strafer's aircraft flying into them? Or, was that later in Korea?Very many people got shot down thinking nobody was going to be shooting at them while they were shooting at a potential victim ...
The people shooting at the shooters were usually called wingmen.
How would you even confirm a strafing "kill"? Every parked airplane hit with machine gun rounds isn't going to instantly explode, and I would suspect that late war German aircraft would have often been parked without fuel, due to the scarcity of it, so probably wouldn't readily burn either.
The whole idea of strafing "aces" seems like an exercise in morale boosting, for the guys that wanted in on the party.
I am not saying it wasn't an excellent use of resources, because knocking them out on the ground was just as useful to the war effort, but recording them as "kills" seems really dubious to me.
Who of the WWII aces really had the highest score? I know that Mannock proponents claim he out scored Bishop by a wide margin.Sidebar:
Rickenbacker's 26 "kills" (internet presumes a whole lot) included two grounded balloons.
When I was secretary of the aces assn, I computed that by WW II standards his score was 7 and change. Lots of OOCs (that apparently he could confirm as squadron CO) and the all-time howler: "Fokker last seen in vertical bank."
Or a couple of these; I wonder how many P-47 pilots punched a few .5" holes in a plywood "Stuka", and marked another kill on the squadron tally board.maybe left some useless duds out in plane sight to draw the allied Jabos.
I assume you meant WWI? Too late to change anything now, Richthofen got 80 for the Central Powers, and Fonck got 75 for the Allies. Those numbers will never officially change.Who of the WWII aces really had the highest score? I know that Mannock proponents claim he out scored Bishop by a wide margin.
How would you even confirm a strafing "kill"? Every parked airplane hit with machine gun rounds isn't going to instantly explode, and I would suspect that late war German aircraft would have often been parked without fuel, due to the scarcity of it, so probably wouldn't readily burn either.
The whole idea of strafing "aces" seems like an exercise in morale boosting, for the guys that wanted in on the party.
I am not saying it wasn't an excellent use of resources, because knocking them out on the ground was just as useful to the war effort, but recording them as "kills" seems really dubious to me.
The Luftwaffe had regulations which explain how they saw a ground abschuss.How would you even confirm a strafing "kill"?
I agree, but.That was General Kenney's approach in the Pacific. The more aircraft you destroy on the ground the less you have to fight in the air.
From day one he made destroying airfields and their aircraft a priority.
Can't recall those, but that doesn't mean it didn't happen ...IIRC, weren't there cases of strafing aircraft shooting themselves down? Bullets ricocheting off the ground, and back into the air, and the strafer's aircraft flying into them? Or, was that later in Korea?
I understand that. I am curious to know if anyone has done actual comparison to actual enemy loss recordsI assume you meant WWI? Too late to change anything now, Richthofen got 80 for the Central Powers, and Fonck got 75 for the Allies. Those numbers will never officially change.
I am specifically referring to the end of the war which dramatically inflates the ground claim totals . Of the 6796 claims made in the ETO, 3703 were made in one month, April 1945. That's is 60% of the total. The second highest month is 527 in, coincidently, April 1944 which is a bit of an outlier.I agree, but.
Reluctant Poster said:
When most of the strafing claims were made the Luftwaffe was finished. Just like sinking immobile Japanese ships at Kure where over 100 young Americans lost their lives for no purpose. Basically higher echelon blood lust.
That is a little too strong - The whole idea was to destroy the Luftwaffe (or Japanese aircraft, prior to the Invasion. Doolitlle incented pilots to strafe airfields to kill aircraft on the ground and in return he offered the same credit as an air to air victory.
My father's group had highest ground score total for all air forces (at least known to me). They lost 90 Mustangs from flak, 40 air to air for 352 air/502 ground total. No German fighter came close to him, but he scored four belly landings, one behind enemy lines where he was picked up and rescued - all flak caused ranging from train, one airfield and two marshaling yards.