Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Strategic recon typically flies high and fast. Tactical recon flies low and slow...
There is a very blurred line between reconnaissance and army cooperation. Aircraft like the Lysander, Storch and Hs126 were used for observation purposes but they were equally useful for broader roles like message couriers, message dropping, commander's personal transport etc. There were dedicated PR aircraft - the Spits and Mossies flying alone and unarmed over enemy territory - and there were also fighter-recce aircraft that carried both guns and cameras, the latter often mounted obliquely because such aircraft typically operated at low levels. All contributed to intelligence gathering but they did different things and at different time periods as the fighting need evolved.
The fighter aircraft was nowhere near as capable as Fw-189 for tactical recon but I suppose you have no choice without air superiority. Just as Ju-87Ds were replaced with less effective but more survivable Fw-190F late in the war.replaced by Fw 189 but when even that was found out to be too vulnerable units began to get tac rec 109s.
Messerschmitt built 80 LR Recon Bf 109G-4/R3s in 1943, they were able to carry 2 x 300ltr dts.
It also meant that the Germans over estimated the damage they were doing to Fighter Command.
Yes, this is true, but like I said, these were used for tactical and battlefield recon by fighter Staffeln within the Aufklarungsgruppen.
These aircraft cannot be compared with the RAF's dedicated photo recon Spitfires as strategic recon platforms
and it's in this role that the Germans had no equivalent to the RAF until the jets came along, specifically the Ar 234.
Its not that the Germans didn't know about the use of high speed single seaters as camera platforms; there is a commonly held misconception that the RAF didn't have Spitfires in France prior to its fall in 1940; there were Spits of Sidney Cotton's Photographic Development Unit there and one of these was captured by the Germans.
... These aircraft cannot be compared with the RAF's dedicated photo recon Spitfires as strategic recon platforms and it's in this role that the Germans had no equivalent to the RAF until the jets came along, specifically the Ar 234. The RAF PRU served as a seperate function to the tactical recon Army Co-op squadrons that you describe. The PRU was a close knit community of hand picked individuals who answered not only to the RAF hierarchy, but also to different British intelligence departments; a comparison might be the difference between the units that operated the RF-4 Photo Phantom and those that operate(d) the U-2 and SR-71. Two different kettles of photogenic fish.
Its not that the Germans didn't know about the use of high speed single seaters as camera platforms; there is a commonly held misconception that the RAF didn't have Spitfires in France prior to its fall in 1940; there were Spits of Sidney Cotton's Photographic Development Unit there and one of these was captured by the Germans. There's a series of propaganda images that appeared in Der Adler showing a Spitfire being chased by a Bf 109; it's an unarmed PR Spit painted in dubious British markings by the Germans.
As for the use of the Lysander as a photo recon aircraft, these were typically liaison aircraft and photographic work was done with hand held cameras, not the specialised big long focus ones.
No, the long range recce fighters (G-4/R3 and G-6/R3, Gewaehltaufklarer) were specifically for strategic missions - why bother with two droptanks otherwise? Unlike RAF PRs, these also retained their motor cannon.
And why is that, because they were not RAF or not Spitfires?
It was hardly an idea only the British came up with.
These were with cameras, guns and faster than any RAF fighter in 1940.
The Germans had recce versions of Bf 109E and 110C in production when the RAF had, IIRC a pair of prototype Spitfires (and as you said one of them soon in German hands), provisionally fitted with cameras. Now the "unarmed" part was pretty much a necessity by the RAF, since the Spitfire wing either carried guns, or fuel. And they had to cover plenty of distance.
Its not that, indeed. They were producing high speed single seaters as camera platforms. Its a common misconception in Britain, that because all the post-war hype of those mid- and late war PR Spitfires, that the Germans couldn't possibly have something similar. In fact they did, and it seems they were already series producing the recce Bf 109E-5, E-6, E-8, E-9 while the RAF had basically two and a confusing myriad of proposed PR Marks at the time.
There were several versions of Bf109 for recon.where were the cameras put on the Bf 109? Were they large high altitude cameras?
This is very interersting Tante Ju, I wasn't aware of these variants of the Bf 109. You've aroused my curiosity now; firstly, where were the cameras carried, what sort of cameras - in terms of focal length etc were they and what sorts of missions did they fly?
Pierre Clostermann tells of shooting down a very high altitude 109G going over Scapa Flow in his book. So they definitely used them.
And of course they used the Ju-86Ps for high altitude recon for a while, until fighter performance caught up. The story about how they modified a few Spit Mk Vs to shoot down one at 49,000ft is one of those great stories of the war (though seldom mentioned is the decompression sickness quite a few of the Spit pilots suffered as a result).
but the locations for the cameras were either fitted behind the pilot in the fuselage, on the bottom centerline of the fuselage just aft of the wing or along the bottom of the fuselage offset to either side of the centerline between the tailwheel and the mainwing. And of course, on the port wing.