Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I know that the Bf109F-6/U was a "Galland" creation, but I have seen several sources list the F-6 as being attached to units such as 1.(F)122 stationed in Italy and North Africa during 1941-43.All from Prien and Rodeike, Schiffer 1995 pages 50, 53, 94. According to this book the Bf 109F-6 didn't exist
German use of its strategic recon assets appear to be determined and persistent at best, but inconsistent and lacking over time to be of real strategic value at worst; furthermore, the modified single-seat assets were not used to the same extent that the British PRU aircraft were, nor did they carry out as extensive operations deep into enemy territory as frequently with the same consistency as the British PRUs
Just a couple of observations/questions. Thse drop tanks on the PR 109 look pretty big, does anyone have any idea what they did to the performance of the aircraft. The second is the camera installation. A Spitfire is pretty narrow and the 109 even thinner, were they able to get the twin installation needed for stero photography?
And/Or: What planes were used for recon and for counter-recon?
Late in the war the Lufftwaffe apparently used the Me262 and 163 to intercept high flying recon aircraft. This resulted in the 7th PG getting P-51Ds to use as escorts for their F-5 Lightnings and PR XI Spitfires but I haven't heard of the RAF's PRU having escorts assigned.
It explains why the 109 wasn't as effective as I thought in the PR role.
...but the Germans often worked directly from negatives placed on light boxes rather than for prints
Agree with every word of ^ that, however it still boggles my mind that the Brits, of all people, out-organised the Germans.
To quote the fellow in Fawlty Towers, "How effer did zey vin?"
the 262s (and all the 1st and quite a few of the 2nd generation jets) had to zoom climb to get at. Hence why they kept using the late model PR Spits for so long.
Part of this was organisational and had little to do with the aircraft's capabilities. Ultimately, the effectiveness of a weapon is determined by its use and the Bf 109 recon variants were effective platforms in terms of the pre-and post battlefield reconnaissance they carried out and the information gleaned from their flights. As strategic recon platofrms outwith the Wehrmacht and LW's battlefields, again, their effectiveness was limited by their usage - too few flights made to be effective enough, maintenance issues, the method by which the data they gathered was analysed and also by the internal organization of the LW all hampered the effective use of the Bf 109 for intelligence.
Actually, working from negatives is usually better than working from prints - the quality of negatives is better because prints are inevitably one generation removed from the originally-captured image. Also "light boxes" (or the more capable light tables) provide a much better illuminant for analysing imagery than shining a spot lamp onto a print.
Most importantly the Luftwaffe didn't have any alternatives.
If the ground organisation had been the slickest in the world, the priority the highest and number of flights increased, they still wouldn't have been nearly as effective.