AI Fails (6 Viewers)
- Thread starter GTX
- Start date
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Warspite63
Staff Sergeant
- 1,112
- Dec 8, 2022
Well, THAT ain't one of 'em.........
special ed
1st Lieutenant
- 7,065
- May 13, 2018
Yesterday saw the gas price sign above a Circle K station with one price "A I"
GrauGeist
Generalfeldmarschall zur Luftschiff Abteilung
This looks more like a tailless Bf162 (and I want to visit the Luftwaffen Museum!)
GrauGeist
Generalfeldmarschall zur Luftschiff Abteilung
Gawd...
Just a puke.
SaparotRob
Unter Gemeine Geschwader Murmeltier XIII
Of course it failed. The P&W 1340's were never ideal for the Lightning .
MiTasol
Major
Especially when the nose cowl is attached to the prop spinner.
Lucky13
Forum Mascot
R Leonard
Staff Sergeant
That's a good idea, USS Monitor's pilot house/station over the stern and all the weight of the turret over the bow. No wonder she sank off Cape Hatteras, that explains it all.
MiTasol
Major
This article is on a different type of AI fail - for the American control and marketing of AI.
I think it can be summarised as below.
The US administration refuses to put controls on AI because they want to be the world leader in AI and will ignore the AI industries own calls for controls because winning this "war" is the only thing that matters to them, with the secondary requirement being that AI is highly profitable.
China currently believes the open source model is preferable and that some control is desirable. Open source means there are no profits directly generated by the AI. If you use the Chinese AI on line then, like with the US AI, the Chinese government will be able to see everything that you do with that AI.
The US model is only accessible from cloud servers in the US which means that everything you do with American AI can be viewed by the US administration. No exceptions.
The Chinese model means you can download the software to your computer, take that computer off line and do all your "design" work without any leakage on to the internet and that information is therefore not accesalbe to the US or Chinese governments. So if you are designing a better (insert product here) the current Chinese versions are your only guarantee of secrecy.
The fact that large US companies are using the Chinese AI instead of the American AI is, to me, a very strong indication that the Chinese have already won this "war".
I think it can be summarised as below.
The US administration refuses to put controls on AI because they want to be the world leader in AI and will ignore the AI industries own calls for controls because winning this "war" is the only thing that matters to them, with the secondary requirement being that AI is highly profitable.
China currently believes the open source model is preferable and that some control is desirable. Open source means there are no profits directly generated by the AI. If you use the Chinese AI on line then, like with the US AI, the Chinese government will be able to see everything that you do with that AI.
The US model is only accessible from cloud servers in the US which means that everything you do with American AI can be viewed by the US administration. No exceptions.
The Chinese model means you can download the software to your computer, take that computer off line and do all your "design" work without any leakage on to the internet and that information is therefore not accesalbe to the US or Chinese governments. So if you are designing a better (insert product here) the current Chinese versions are your only guarantee of secrecy.
The fact that large US companies are using the Chinese AI instead of the American AI is, to me, a very strong indication that the Chinese have already won this "war".
