Airfix 1/48 Spitfire MkVB - Hairy Brush Build

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

WolfRacer

Airman
56
16
Mar 15, 2016
Hey All,

Been a looooong time since I last posted. Many years ago was working on a Zero, then life got in the way, moved house, etc, and it got shelved. It's still sitting on my shelf unfinished unfortunately, I'm scared to remove the masking tape as it has been sitting for years!

Recently got back into it and decided to build a 1/48 Airfix Spitfire that's been sitting on my shelf for a long time.

As something different, I decided to fully paint it with hairy brushes rather than airbrushes, largely due to the difficulty in setting up my airbrush these days and wanting to work on it after I get home from work not really being conducive to airbrushing. So it's more of an experiment than anything.

The roundels, the sky coloured band on the fuselage, and the "no step" lines on the wings were painted with masks and hairy brushes, largely to prove to myself that it's actually possible to do that, I'm pretty happy with how they came out (better than some of the decal came out IMO!).

Being hairy brushed, the model does have a bit of texture to it, but it's so subtle that I struggled to capture it in a photo, though on a sunny day looking up close I can see it. I tried to avoid brush streaks by using large soft brushes (think make up brushes rather than your typical round pointy brush) and applied paint with either a buffing or stabbing/stippling motion, and I used relatively thick paint rather than the traditional advice of thinning it down.

Using that method (stabbing/stippling with a large soft brush) meant that masking was possible. Admittedly the yellow on the roundel was a bit of a pain (took several layers of Games Workshop Averland Sunset as a base, then a couple of coats of AK Interactive Volcano Yellow to get the tone right.

If anyone is interested in the method, happy to talk about it more, as I've not really seen modellers using this approach.

I haven't applied a varnish layer or done any weathering yet, the hairy brush technique means I'm left with a very "clean" looking aircraft (vs applying some gradients or mottling with the airbrush to break it up).

So I'm not really sure how to approach weathering it, any suggestions I'd love to hear them!

Paints used:
I spent a pretty long time and bought an absurd number of paints before settling on the Dark Earth / Dark Green combo, in the end the Dark Earth is just AK Interactive RAF Dark Earth from the Acrylic AIR range, the Dark Green is the RAF Dark Green from the same range, but mixed 1:1 (based on drops rather than volume) with Vallejo US Dark Green. The former was too dark and too green, the latter to pale and light, so just used a mix. The underside is also the AK RAF Sky, but compared to my imagination it was too dark, so I lightened it 1:1 (drops not volume) with Pro Acryl Bold Titanium White. Blue on Roundels is Vallejo Game Colour Imperial Blue (just had it lying around, but it's a really good match to the decals).
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2415_sml.JPG
    IMG_2415_sml.JPG
    182.8 KB · Views: 47
  • IMG_2416_sml.JPG
    IMG_2416_sml.JPG
    191.5 KB · Views: 42
  • IMG_2418_sml.JPG
    IMG_2418_sml.JPG
    268.2 KB · Views: 43
Thanks! Any thoughts on how to weather it, I'm all ears.

I was thinking oils would probably be best, maybe apply some patches and then rub them in to create some gradients. Though in the theme of "low VOC" I'm thinking maybe weathering pencils, but I've never used them before, or perhaps weathering powders (which I have used before but never to good effect).

I didn't mention in my original post, but a brief review of the Airfix kit: Don't buy it unless you really want this particular mark and don't have another option. This is probably the worst modern kit I've built in terms of fit and finish, the cockpit went together reasonably well but it was all downhill after that, the panel that covers the fuel tank doesn't fit well, the cockpit doesn't fit inside the fuselage properly, the wing presses up against the bottom of the cockpit meaning when the cockpit doesn't fit properly, the wing won't fit properly either. If it had really nice surface detailing I could maybe live with the poor fit and finish, but it only has basic panel lining, no rivets, and even some of the panel lines that are shown in the instruction booklet aren't present on the actual kit. I feel like I didn't get the dihedral right, or if I did it was a fluke because it's very easy to tweak the dihedral accidentally when gluing the wing together.

Oh, and the landing gear, worst design ever. It's almost impossible to get it lined up right, and all the weight of the aircraft sits on a little glued joint with no positive locator. I originally glued it with plastic glue, one of them broke off while painting, and I glued it back on with superglue, but I think I'm going to have to build a base for the model to glue it down permanently as I'm worried the gear will break again in future.

These are the sorts of issues that I would have expected from a 30 year old kit, but the tool for this is reasonably new. Actually I've built 30 year old tooling models that were less of a PITA than this, haha.

So, yes, avoid this kit unless you're willing to deal with all those issues.
 
Ah well, I think I'm done with this kit. I noticed a few things I missed while taking these photos, but I think I'll call it done anyway. The exhausts didn't come out great, tried something different and didn't really work. They're not glued in, so maybe one day in the future I'll get some resin exhausts and have another stab at them, but for now I think I'll just leave them.

Overall, pretty happy with how it turned out for a model that didn't see an airbrush at any point and is entirely hairbrushed. I did use spray cans for the primer and for the final clear coat, but other than that, it's all brushed. After the gloss coat (used to seal decals) the brush texture was slightly visible, but after a satin clear coat, I can't see the brush strokes at all, maybe if I stick my nose right up against it and have the light shining from the correct direction, otherwise it looks smooth.

A question to the Spitfire nerds out there... is it just me or is the canopy too prominent? I'm wondering if Airfix made the hood too large so it could fit around the fuselage, because to me it just doesn't quite look right. I've done 1/32 Spits in the past and for some reason this one my eye is drawn to the canopy in a way that it isn't for the other Spits I've made.

I'm thinking of displaying it without the hood (included one picture to show what I mean) as the canopy is distracting me too much.

I find it really hard to capture the colours in photographing models, but the first image here is probably the closest to how it looks in real life in natural lighting, the other images are more how it looks when sitting on my display shelf with artificial lighting.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2433_sml.JPG
    IMG_2433_sml.JPG
    208.7 KB · Views: 38
  • IMG_2436_sml.JPG
    IMG_2436_sml.JPG
    133.7 KB · Views: 38
  • IMG_2437_sml.JPG
    IMG_2437_sml.JPG
    113.1 KB · Views: 38
  • IMG_2442_sml.JPG
    IMG_2442_sml.JPG
    74.7 KB · Views: 40
Well done judging by the pics. Unfortunately the Airfix kit isn't too great one when it comes to the details. One of these is the cockpit conopy that is slightly to short and incorrect in the cross-section. So that's the reason for protruding of the cockpit hood. The another thing is the reinforcement of the wheel bay roofs. The BM597 was assigned to 315 (Polish) Sqn on 7 May 1942 and to 317 (Polish)Sqn on 5 September 1942, both at Woodvale. Here below is a shot of her while servicing in the no.315 Squadron. Any of the reinforcement can't be noticed. From the May to September is a couple of months only. On 13 February 1943, she suffered Cat B damage and was repaired by the de Havilland factory and then sent to the to Vickers Armstrong plant for modification. But is thought to have seen no further action and seems not to return to the no.317 Squadron. So I doubt the correction was introduced there by the time she was damaged during the landing on the 13th February 1943.

Spitfire V BM597.jpg

the pic source: https://polska-zbrojna.pl/Mobile/ArticleShow/30286
 
Thanks for the pic!

I had read before I started the kit that the reinforcement over wheels is representative of BM597 in its modern form (it's an airworthy Spit at Duxford I believe). I was originally aiming for an early MkVb, but given the kit is setup like this decided to just leave the reinforcements as if it was the modern version.

If I'd known how bad the Airfix canopy was before I started, I probably would have modeled the canopy closed, or maybe even turfed the kit and built something else, doh! It's not really possible to change to closed now without major surgery as the closed canopy version requires building the fuselage differently. Playing around, I found hacking up a closed canopy gave a better silhouette... but unfortunately I snapped it while trying to trim it down to fit. Oh well, there are other canopy variants in the box I could try trimming to fit, otherwise I'll just leave it hoodless as that seems to be a better option than having the weirdly large hood and move on to the next kit...
 
Grasped. Anyway nice to see the Spitfire of the Polish Squadron. :thumbright: :)
 
Thanks! Next on the table is either a 1/48 Mk1 Spitfire from Tamiya, or a 1/48 Tempest V from Eduard... so either a completely different British fighter, or an almost identical one on which I can remedy some of my failings on this one, haha.

Or maybe a 1/48 Tamiya F16, haven't done a "modern" jet since I was a kid.
 
Thanks! I cracked another canopy trying to cut it up, lol. There's one left, I might buy a saw rather than trying to cut it with my hobby knife. If that fails, I'll just leave it without the hood on.
 
Well Done! I find the RAF Tactical Camo one of the hardest to do well.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back