NATO vows to stick with Ukraine ‘as long as it takes’
We are pretty much becoming a de facto NATO army,” Ukraine’s foreign minister says in his first NATO-Ukraine Council meeting.
www.politico.eu
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
That scene reminds me of what Patton wrote in his book "War As I Knew It". I think he was describing the destruction of a German column attempting a breakout from, I think, the Kolmar Pocket. He wrote that he could walk a hundred yards down the road, never stepping on the ground, just stepping from one dead body to another.*NSFW* - graphic images.
Video taken this last October of the aftermath of Ukrainian artillery catching a Russian convoy on a road near Donetsk.
It appears that after all this time, the Russians have not yet learned that columns are a sure-fire way to get annihilated.
FUNKER530 | Military Videos and News
Funker530: Combat footage and military news for the veteran community.funker530.com
It's taking as long as it takes because NATO has spent the last twenty months trickling out lethal aid. Imagine if Ukraine of Nov 2022 had the NATO support of Nov 2025.NATO vows to stick with Ukraine ‘as long as it takes’
We are pretty much becoming a de facto NATO army,” Ukraine’s foreign minister says in his first NATO-Ukraine Council meeting.www.politico.eu
Imagine if NATO did not support Ukraine in 2022 just like it failed to do in 2014...It's taking as long as it takes because NATO has spent the last twenty months trickling out lethal aid. Imagine if Ukraine of Nov 2022 had the NATO support of Nov 2025.
To be fair, Ukraine has been independent since 1991 and had more than twenty years before 2014 to get its house and defences in order. And in 2014 the Ukrainians let themselves down, either fleeing from or collaborating with the Russians. Let's be clear, it's not NATO's fault that Russia was able to take Crimea with hardly a shot, but it's seemingly NATO's responsibility to now indefinitely bankroll and provide for Ukraine's second round.Imagine if NATO did not support Ukraine in 2022 just like it failed to do in 2014...
I agree, we're stuck paying Ukraine's ticket as the best option. If we're going to carry on, I wish we'd hurry up and give Ukraine the air superiority and breaching tools they need to go through the Russian forces, minefields and defensive works. If Ukraine has not reached Armyansk by the end of 2024, I think they're kippered. By 2025 Russia will have Crimea fortified and inpregnable.Unfortunately we either bankroll them or we do the fighting for them. I think everyone agrees that is not the greatest idea.