Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Warships IFR, one of only two print magazines I still subscribe to has reported that Russian amphibious assault ships have left the Pacific, sailed past Japan. Others are transferring from the Baltic to the Mediterranean. At least one land attack missile equipped SSN is also in the Med. The belief is that they're all heading for the Black Sea to support a coastal landing against Ukraine.
NATO does have a CBG in the Eastern Med, but they can't do anything of course. Too bad the Turks can't accidentally block the Bosporus.
How does Turkey stop them? Clearly international law, like the Montrose Convention is meaningless to Putin.Bosporos is blocked by Turkey for Russian warships which weren't based in Black Sea when their war began.
How does Turkey stop them? Clearly international law, like the Montrose Convention is meaningless to Putin.
Dude!Ah... a fellow tribesmen, devoted to the church of blues , where the dodge of Monaco is hailed as the the only saint and where we all hate Illinois Nazis.
Warships IFR, one of only two print magazines I still subscribe to has reported that Russian amphibious assault ships have left the Pacific, sailed past Japan. Others are transferring from the Baltic to the Mediterranean. At least one land attack missile equipped SSN is also in the Med. The belief is that they're all heading for the Black Sea to support a coastal landing against Ukraine.
NATO does have a CBG in the Eastern Med, but they can't do anything of course. Too bad the Turks can't accidentally block the Bosporus.
Ah... a fellow tribesmen, devoted to the church of blues , where the dodge of Monaco is hailed as the the only saint and where we all hate Illinois Nazis.
Beyond killing, dehousing and frightening civilians have those missiles achieved any reductions in Ukrainian armed resistance?
Militarily, which is why any attempt to bring Russian warships into the Black Sea is so dangerous. The risk of one or both sides opening fire and causing casualties is considerable.
However, Turkey is operating entirely within the remit of the Montreux Convention. There is a war happening and Turkey can bar access to belligerents' military vessels except those normally based in the Black Sea.
And because Turkey is acting IAW international law and is a NATO member, the carrier battle group in the eastern Med would be easily justified ... which is, as you say, the reason why the Russians trying to bring that amphib group through is so dangerous.
And because Turkey is acting IAW international law and is a NATO member, the carrier battle group in the eastern Med would be easily justified ... which is, as you say, the reason why the Russians trying to bring that amphib group through is so dangerous.
I've been trying to link this. Look up "this is too muchRussian soldier falls off tank" on YouTube.
I think the utter collapse of the US-trained Afghan Army as soon as the Taliban said boo was a shock to the Chinese and seen as an incentive to Putin. The Ukrainian example is the polar opposite.I suspect that one of the reasons that China might be wary is that Ukraine's military discipline has been a result of the military training they received from the US since 2014.