Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
At this point, I'm pretty sure that any Russian AFV is becoming an endangered species.
Even more insane: they actually learned that lesson in Grozny in the first Chechnya war. Apparently, none of the survivors of that fiasco thought to pass on any pointers......
That 's one small example of Russia's failure to train their troops, too.
The dismounts were not actively seeking cover but instead, huddled together like lost Girl Scouts, making them an easy target.
It's not that Russia didn't get the memo, it's that themeatrecruits never got a chance to read it. Their officer corps was decimated (1 in 10, right?). The junior officers fared worse. Their NCO corps ain't. Criminals and conscripts are immediately thrown into the vatnik chipper.
If I was dragged out of a gutter, thrown into the back of a scoobee-do van and suddenly dropped off into a killing zone, I'd probably react the same way.
And yet, despite horrendous losses, the Russians continue to gain ground, continue to take village after village. If the Russian model is to throw meat waves without care for losses while successfully moving forward, well I'd say the doctrine is not flawed.The Soviet Red Army advisors in Iraq were able to see first hand how their doctrine was horribly flawed.
True. But the Russian military needs to go into the scrap bin anyway, so might as well burn it up whilst grabbing some Ukrainian land. Once there's a settlement the Russian military will not be fighting again in the next couple of decades unless they choose to. Ukraine will be limited by international demands, and the Georgians and Moldovans seems to be reluctant to expel their Russian-held/supported enclaves.Russia may win this war, but they will sacrifice their military power in doing so. That military power being the rank-and-file. Dead sergeants lead no troops.
Look at the pace at which Russia is gaining.And yet, despite horrendous losses, the Russians continue to gain ground, continue to take village after village. If the Russian model is to throw meat waves without care for losses while successfully moving forward, well I'd say the doctrine is not flawed.
I know that the Russians don't get much training, but eight days? That isn't enough time to get the uniform, fill in the papers and catch the train to the front.That 's one small example of Russia's failure to train their troops, too.
The dismounts were not actively seeking cover but instead, huddled together like lost Girl Scouts, making them an easy target.
Its worth remembering that no dictator like having his best troops wasted, because if they turn on him, he is done.North Korea's forces appear to be the latest 'expendable' army chewed up fighting Russia's war against Ukraine
North Korean troops, largely special ops forces, have suffered high casualty rates in bloody assaults, not unlike prison units.www.businessinsider.com
Honestly, I think 'doctrine' is not really applicable ... it appears to consist of 'let's send lots of people we just took off the street a week ago and put into matching green outfits towards the well-entrenched and equipped enemy. Eventually, they might run out of ammo. And make sure we obliterate any settlements'. That appears to be about itThe Soviet Red Army advisors in Iraq were able to see first hand how their doctrine was horribly flawed.
The sh!t show in Ukraine is literally WWII tactics v2.0 and shows they have not learned a damn thing in 80 years.