"All of Vlad's forces and all of Vlad's men, are out to put Humpty together again." (2 Viewers)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

This would imply that they are not:
I don't see a lot of fixed wing strike aircraft losses that mention SAMs. A very few give us the necessary info to decide on the SAM risk to strike aircraft, like:

"25 February 2022: An Su-27 was shot down over Kyiv by Russian S-400 air defense system"

Instead that website lists losses like the below:

24 February 2022: Ukrainian Su-24 is lost during the opening days of the war in Poltava.
27 February 2022: A Su-24 call sign White 44, from 7th Tactical Aviation Brigade was lost near Bucha
27 February 2022: A Su-25, call sign Blue 39, was shot down near Hlibivka Vyshgorod, Kyiv


What happened to these aircraft? Why were the first two lost? Perhaps mechanical or operator failures? What shot down the last one? No mention of SAMs. Maybe it was AAMs or gunfire?
 
Last edited:
Given that at the start of this year they reportedly had around 15 - 20 in service and have lost 9 - 10 it is still fairly significant.

See the following from here (noting both source though also other inputs)

 
Yes, but are they equiped with the latest Garmins?
 
Wasn't the A-10 designed at the same time as the Soviet-era SAMs the Russians are using now? This IS the environment the A-10 is intended to fight in.

Well, the "Soviet Era" spans 1918 thru 1991 which is a rather long time in technology development terms.

The A-10 entered service in 1977. The SA-15 that we're seeing in Ukraine entered service a decade later. Thus the A-10 was designed to operate in the air defence environment of the SA-15's predecessor, the SA-8. Also, the SA-15 has been further developed after its entry into service to make it more capable.

So, no, the A-10 was not designed to go up against the SAMs being used in Ukraine today.
 
The thing to remember about the A-10 is that it was not designed to operate in a vacuum. It was supposed to operate in concert with top cover (ie fighters and interceptors) and SAM suppression platforms (ie Wild Weasel and other attack platforms). While the other platforms were at least contesting air supremacy, and suppressing and/or destroying the SAM systems, the A-10s would sledge-hammer the mobile ground forces.

There is no reason to think that the A-10 would not still be an effective platform under the current circumstances given the right support.

Having said all that, I say again:
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Frog