"All of Vlad's forces and all of Vlad's men, are out to put Humpty together again." (4 Viewers)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

I admit that its difficult to see this as anything but a sure sign of Russia's weakness'. The S300 is till a noteworthy piece of kit, but it has some well known failings, and to take it away from an ally shows that they have nothing better available and the bottom of the barrel is being reached.
 
AFAIK, the bann is for militar ships, not for civil ships carrying military equipment, so...
Well then, that's how the Ukraine navy can get its SSKs. There must be some ex-Soviet submariners in Ukraine who can operate an older surplus SSK. Can anyone spare a Kilo?



Plus LCS and fast attack missile boats.



And tanks…



Come on Turkey, you're part of NATO. If Ukraine falls you might very well be next on Russia's menu.
 
Last edited:

But a civilian ship carrying war materials becomes a legit target, shouldn't it?

Lusitania anyone?
 
What do we predict will be the first NATO or Western designed manned military aircraft supplied post invasion to be operated by the UAF? As I understand it, Ukraine hasn't received a single fixed wing or rotary aircraft, combat, transport or civilian from any NATO or Western countries since the invasion.


This link shows one aircraft from a now NATO member, the Aero L-39 Albatros. I assume these were provided to Ukraine before the Feb invasion.



That's it, not a single Western-designed aircraft of any sort yet provided.

In my search I had a look at Ukraine's civil airlines. This appeal from one to the West caught my eye, Flight booking, cheap airline tickets, cheap air flights - SkyUp Airlines.
 
Last edited:
It's about context. The more capable the airframe, the longer the training time, generally. The West thought Ukraine would lose quickly, and so offers of help in aviation were not made, and the Polish thing got stymied early on too. I think they thought at this point that training Ukrainians to fly F-16s or Eurofighters did not have a realistic timeline.

Fast-forward a few months and we see the resistance holding, maybe now there's time to both train the pilots and refurb the donated aircraft.

In short, I think there's a little bit of hindsightium involved here. I sure didn't think Ukraine would last more than a week. But that was before we got this glimpse into the true status of the Russian military, If we'd known the Ukrainians would hold solid north of Kyev, an early training/supply program for the F-16 could have happened ... but of course we couldn't know that at that time.
 
Remember, the first Western aid offered was to fly Zelensky to the country of exile of his choice.
It took the resolve of a comedian to shame the West into doing the right thing.

Right, the lack of faith was clear. As the whole shebang kicked off I too figured there'd be no time for anything, so I'm not trying to launch jabs or anything; I was equally wrong.
 
A propos of not very much...but Dear Old Blighty reported that it imported zero, repeat zero, fuel of any kind from Russia during the month of June. It's the first time this has ever happened.

Now, one swallow doesn't make a summer etc etc...and it must also be noted that the UK is far less dependent on Russian oil and gas than other nations in Europe. However, it's a clear step in the right direction.

 
What do we predict will be the first NATO or Western designed manned military aircraft supplied post invasion to be operated by the UAF?
F-16s

I posted a link upthread around last Thursday about the UAF being in discussion with Lockheed Martin this time last year about procuring F-16s.

It seems to me that the Russian invasion has accelerated things.
 
The Grippen seems like a good candidate for Ukraine. I doubt there are quite as many available as F-16s. I wonder if we should send a few, not necessarily airworthy, F-16s just to have ground crews able to familiarize themselves with it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread