"All of Vlad's forces and all of Vlad's men, are out to put Humpty together again." (2 Viewers)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

The threat of attack by their Satan II (RS-28) missiles are, indeed a thinly veiled threat of nuclear attack.
I don't want to see it tested, but I wonder in the post-CW era's institutional theft and corruption if Russia's ICBM force is truely operational?



 
Last edited:
Ah. And what did he predict the British and NATO response would be?

Britain doesn't have like weapons with which to reply in kind. So it'll be at minimum conventional TLAMs into Moscow - and we've seen how inept Russian air defences are.

Well...there's a difference between forward-deployed air defences and those protecting the motherland, particularly Moscow. I think NATO's response would be to take to the field, en masse, to destroy the Russian army in Ukraine and roll it back to the pre-2014 borders....and then stop and demand peace terms from Moscow.

Of course, all this is hypothetical because we've no idea whether Russia even has the number of hypersonic missiles to conduct the attack as outlined by the nut-job Gurulev. When they're throwing ancient SS-21 SCARABs at Ukraine, with only a few confirmed instances of hypersonic missile use, I have to wonder how big the arsenal of the latter is, particularly as it will be hard to replenish given current sanctions.
 

One has to question his grasp of geography with his statement that Britain is the "closest target."

You'd think, given that their level of GPS development is non-existent, that Russian military personnel would know how to read a map.
 
The threat of attack by their Satan II (RS-28) missiles are, indeed a thinly veiled threat of nuclear attack.

The Satan II is an ICBM carrying up to 15 warheads.

Where were Satan II missiles mentioned in the article? Gurulev specifically mentioned Zircon hypersonic missiles in the linked article. Is there another, more comprehensive version of the story that mentions Satan II?
 
Where were Satan II missiles mentioned in the article? Gurulev specifically mentioned Zircon hypersonic missiles in the linked article. Is there another, more comprehensive version of the story that mentions Satan II?
This goes back to May, but it's been mentioned several times since then, both by Kremlin mouth-pieces and by that Olga female on their pet TV station.

 

Ahhhh...gotcha. Thanks for the pointer. Still, pick a fight with little old Blighty and NATO will respond full-force. And if nukes are used, it'll be endex for Moscow unless Russia also tries to take out the US at the same time.
 
I honestly think their nuclear arsenal is not in very good shape.
The reasons you mentioned, plus apathy in the ranks (which effects upkeep of hardware) makes it very likely that a portion of the missiles are not fit to be used.
 
The other observation about the Satan II is that it was only tested back in April 2022 so I question the number they actually have in service.
Russia has been going on about it's fearsome hypersonic missiles, but I don't recall any word of it being tested.
The same can be said of China's hypersonic missile, too.

The only test that I'm aware of, was the U.S. test back in late June (or early July), which failed. The failure was caused by an "anomaly" due to the "complexity of it's design".

So if the U.S. is having issues with it, I'm thinking that Russia is waving a piece of paper at everyone and expecting them to be frightened.
 

Here's some fact-checking by Reuters on Satan II:



Regarding the test, here's some info on the test and current status. It's from Wiki but given the lies the emanate from Moscow, it's probably as accurate as any other info on the missile that's available on the interwebbythingy:

On 20 April 2022, according to the Russian Defense Ministry:

"At 15:12 Moscow time at the Plesetsk state test cosmodrome in the Arkhangelsk region, a Sarmat fixed-based intercontinental ballistic missile was successfully launched from a silo launcher."— Russian Defense Ministry

The first contract for the production of the missiles was signed in August 2022.



Note that if the first production contract was only signed this month (yes, we're still in August....just), then there's NO WAY they'll have an operational force for many months to come.
 

Oh...and they're struggling to build new tanks so what chance of building a new, high-tech missile that allegedly has performance that no other country's missile programme has yet achieved.

I'm not ready to start quaking in my boots just yet.
 

Users who are viewing this thread