The way things are going this thread could be a history of the last days of Putins Russia.Those Russian vox-boxes certainly dislike it when the proletariat get ideas above their station. It's a long-running thread through the nation's history.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
The way things are going this thread could be a history of the last days of Putins Russia.Those Russian vox-boxes certainly dislike it when the proletariat get ideas above their station. It's a long-running thread through the nation's history.
Russia through its invasion has hugely boosted Ukrainian nationalism, linguistic/ethnic identity and global recognition. That's called unintended consequences.…encouraging Ukrainians to look away from their masters.
Which hypersonics are you referring to? Because they have used Kh-47s against Ukraine.Russia has been going on about it's fearsome hypersonic missiles, but I don't recall any word of it being tested.
The same can be said of China's hypersonic missile, too.
The only test that I'm aware of, was the U.S. test back in late June (or early July), which failed. The failure was caused by an "anomaly" due to the "complexity of it's design".
So if the U.S. is having issues with it, I'm thinking that Russia is waving a piece of paper at everyone and expecting them to be frightened.
I was surprised there were any memorials left that survived the early 1990s.I admit that I had never thought that the Russian leadership would manage to alienate the other nations that endured the events of WWII, to the degree that they would begin tearing down memorials to the sacrifices of the Russian & Soviet Union peoples.
re the UK being the "closest target"
From what I have been reading, it appears that the Russian nationalist 'elite' are suffering from a combination of arrogance and self-originating propaganda.
It seems the idea is that the US and UK are the ringleaders/prime-movers behind opposition to Russia. The rest of NATO (and whoever) are followers of the US and UK political machines.
It is a bit insulting to the UK and other countries concerned.
Many of the Russian leadership consider the US to be a manufacturing problem and a meddling influence on the rest of the world, but that the US itself would fall apart under any real threat to the mainland.
Russia considers Britain to be the 'spine' of NATO (this has been a phrase used repeatedly in Russian internal discussions).
The rest of the EU & NATO are considered (by a majority of the Russian leadership) to be either unable and/or unwilling to stand up to Russian threat if left without US and UK influence. This attitude is particularly prevalent where the former Warsaw Pact countries are considered. It seems they hold the leadership and will of the people of Poland (for example) to resist in similar regard as they did that of the Ukrainians.
You would think that they would have wised up to the error in their equation after what has happened in Ukraine, but there seems to be a time lag among Russia's leadership in processing the implication of recent events, and understanding/accepting the lesson being learned.
There are reportedly quite a few of the Russian hierarchy that are not blind, but they have to be careful what they say around the 'true believers' and hence are reluctant to say anything at all.
Once again Putin briefed at the tiny desk and holding the corner with the right hand.
I wonder what Russians think of the peaceful (POTUS45's nonsense aside) transition of power in the US. Since Putin came to power in 1999 the USA has had five Presidents. Do Russian's see this as weakness or strength?Much of the Russian spoutage on NATO and the west smacks of mirror-imaging. They live under an autocratic dictatorship and thus they view the US and NATO through that prism,
I wonder what Russians think of the peaceful (POTUS45's nonsense aside) transition of power in the US. Since Putin came to power in 1999 the USA has had five Presidents. Do Russian's see this as weakness or strength?
If we go back to the early days of Russia's invasion, it was Poland who led the charge in Ukraine's assistance, not the US or UK.
It was impressive to see how quickly the European nations set aside their differences and immediately focused on getting help to the Ukrainians.