"All of Vlad's forces and all of Vlad's men, are out to put Humpty together again." (4 Viewers)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

re the UK being the "closest target"

From what I have been reading, it appears that the Russian nationalist 'elite' are suffering from a combination of arrogance and self-originating propaganda.

It seems the idea is that the US and UK are the ringleaders/prime-movers behind opposition to Russia. The rest of NATO (and whoever) are followers of the US and UK political machines.

It is a bit insulting to the UK and other countries concerned.

Many of the Russian leadership consider the US to be a manufacturing problem and a meddling influence on the rest of the world, but that the US itself would fall apart under any real threat to the mainland.

Russia considers Britain to be the 'spine' of NATO (this has been a phrase used repeatedly in Russian internal discussions).

The rest of the EU & NATO are considered (by a majority of the Russian leadership) to be either unable and/or unwilling to stand up to Russian threat if left without US and UK influence. This attitude is particularly prevalent where the former Warsaw Pact countries are considered. It seems they hold the leadership and will of the people of Poland (for example) to resist in similar regard as they did that of the Ukrainians.

You would think that they would have wised up to the error in their equation after what has happened in Ukraine, but there seems to be a time lag among Russia's leadership in processing the implication of recent events, and understanding/accepting the lesson being learned.

There are reportedly quite a few of the Russian hierarchy that are not blind, but they have to be careful what they say around the 'true believers' and hence are reluctant to say anything at all.
 
Russia has been going on about it's fearsome hypersonic missiles, but I don't recall any word of it being tested.
The same can be said of China's hypersonic missile, too.

The only test that I'm aware of, was the U.S. test back in late June (or early July), which failed. The failure was caused by an "anomaly" due to the "complexity of it's design".

So if the U.S. is having issues with it, I'm thinking that Russia is waving a piece of paper at everyone and expecting them to be frightened.
Which hypersonics are you referring to? Because they have used Kh-47s against Ukraine.
 
I admit that I had never thought that the Russian leadership would manage to alienate the other nations that endured the events of WWII, to the degree that they would begin tearing down memorials to the sacrifices of the Russian & Soviet Union peoples.
I was surprised there were any memorials left that survived the early 1990s.
 
re the UK being the "closest target"

From what I have been reading, it appears that the Russian nationalist 'elite' are suffering from a combination of arrogance and self-originating propaganda.

It seems the idea is that the US and UK are the ringleaders/prime-movers behind opposition to Russia. The rest of NATO (and whoever) are followers of the US and UK political machines.

It is a bit insulting to the UK and other countries concerned.

Many of the Russian leadership consider the US to be a manufacturing problem and a meddling influence on the rest of the world, but that the US itself would fall apart under any real threat to the mainland.

Russia considers Britain to be the 'spine' of NATO (this has been a phrase used repeatedly in Russian internal discussions).

The rest of the EU & NATO are considered (by a majority of the Russian leadership) to be either unable and/or unwilling to stand up to Russian threat if left without US and UK influence. This attitude is particularly prevalent where the former Warsaw Pact countries are considered. It seems they hold the leadership and will of the people of Poland (for example) to resist in similar regard as they did that of the Ukrainians.

You would think that they would have wised up to the error in their equation after what has happened in Ukraine, but there seems to be a time lag among Russia's leadership in processing the implication of recent events, and understanding/accepting the lesson being learned.

There are reportedly quite a few of the Russian hierarchy that are not blind, but they have to be careful what they say around the 'true believers' and hence are reluctant to say anything at all.

Much of the Russian spoutage on NATO and the west smacks of mirror-imaging. They live under an autocratic dictatorship and thus they view the US and NATO through that prism, with the US mandating and the NATO Allies genuflecting and simply doing America's will.

Anyone who's sat in on NATO meetings can attest the inaccuracy of that view. The US doesn't dictate policy, military or otherwise, to its NATO Allies...and the NATO Allies themselves are not shrinking violets who simply toe the line. It takes so long to accomplish ANYTHING within NATO simply because of differing national positions across all the NATO Allies.
 
The US, UK and NATO 'lackeys' were the focus of military planning for so long in Russia it hasn't really changed.

This is reflected in the use of ground forces and the use of the air force in particular.
 
Much of the Russian spoutage on NATO and the west smacks of mirror-imaging. They live under an autocratic dictatorship and thus they view the US and NATO through that prism,
I wonder what Russians think of the peaceful (POTUS45's nonsense aside) transition of power in the US. Since Putin came to power in 1999 the USA has had five Presidents. Do Russian's see this as weakness or strength?
 
I wonder what Russians think of the peaceful (POTUS45's nonsense aside) transition of power in the US. Since Putin came to power in 1999 the USA has had five Presidents. Do Russian's see this as weakness or strength?

To the "true believers" in Russia, democracy is inherently flawed and weak. Dissent and disagreement slow down decision-making, which offers advantages to centralized autocracies which can make decisions faster. In addition, the political divisions within democracies are fracture points which can be (and are) exploited by those autocratic governments that seek to disrupt democratic nations.
 
Have the Ukrainian Air Assault Forces played any roles since the invasion beyond regular infantry?


It would be something if a parachute attack as part of the Kherson offensive was undertaken in order to secure or prevent river crossings behind the Russian lines. This would presumably be one of the first large scale drops since 2003's Operation Northern Delay.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back