Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Beside the vast numbers of hardware (and men) losed by Rusia, I think that the inteligence harvest of captured equipment will be a major handicap for the rebuilding of the russian forces 8n the future.
How could you overcome the fact that examples of your ultimate hardware are on your enemies hands?
"........All our missiles was targeted [at] energy infrastructure, communication centres and military headquarters,......"
I have not seen many examples of really new systems being captured
Pride of Russian army fell into hands of Ukrainian Soldiers
Pride of the Russian Armed Forces, a fully intact example of Russia’s T-90M tank has been captured by Ukrainian Soldiers in the Kharkiv region. Pictures of the abandoned Russian T-90M tank began circulating on social media last week. Multiple photos of the exterior and interior of the secret...defence-blog.com
I am afraid not. However, some of the key points in the article are as follows:-Could you plse give a link to that article.
The audio in that video identifies the system as the 9K331M, that is the Tor-M1. This was introduced in 1991. While certainly a very good system, and undoubtedly continually updated, it is not an "ultimate hardware", and people have been studying it a long time.
Yes, I am sure there has been some good intel gleaned in this conflict, probably enough to keep certain alphabet agencies busy for years, however I have not seen many examples of really new systems being captured. I don't think I have seen OSINT images of anything like an S-350/400/500 being captured (unless I missed them, quite possible). There have been a few interesting captured things showing up in online images, like the R381T Taran-M system and the 1L269 Krasukha-2 systems, but I suspect both of those had been accessed before (for example, the Taran goes back to the Cold War, and I believe Libya had / has the Krasukha-2). And some sources made a lot of noise about the Ka-52 shoot downs (what is it 6 or 7 now in Ukraine?), but it is important to remember that has been in production for 14 years, I don't know if any of those were updated to Ka-52M specs or not.
T!
This is an entirely plausible argument.Now I understand...Russia didn't attack civilian Ukrainian targets. Rather, it was the fault of Ukrainian missile defences that caused civilian targets to be hit. Once again, how DARE those dastardly Ukrainians have the temerity to defend themselves.
A Russian MP and state television presenter has claimed Russia did not target civilian infrastructure in Ukraine, following an apparent ramp up in attacks across the country, including in the capital Kyiv today.
"Our military is not attacking, is not shelling cities and civilian infrastructure. All our missiles was targeted [at] energy infrastructure, communication centres and military headquarters," Evgeny Popov told BBC Radio 4's World at One programme.
He blamed Ukrainian anti-missile systems for strikes on civilian targets, including a children's playground.
"If you see some missiles and blows on children grounds, it was a result of the work of anti-missile system, Ukrainian system," he said.
We are definitely in "1984" Ministry of Truth territory.
I hope that is hit again and destroyed. Hopefully it will be jam packed with fleeing Orcs.The Kerch bridge still stands, and traffic continues to cross. Presumably the rail bridge will return to operation any day now. Will Ukraine it it again?