A Ukrainian woman's harrowing quest to find her family
Nina Melenets buries her son more than seven months after she says he was killed by shelling in their village in eastern Ukraine.
www.abc.net.au
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
So we appease Putin and tell the Ukrainians they can only shoot at Russians if the Russians shoot first?I think this would be the time to start hashing out some kind of agreement: I figure it would have to allow the Russians to save face and get the Ukranians to refrain from offensive action into Russia since that would force responses and escalate the situation.
How do you sell systemic change to a people who've been conditioned over the past millennium to exist under one tyrannical regime after another, and haven't a clue how to operate responsibly in a free society? Can tomorrow's strongman be any improvement over today's?It will take more than regime change, it will require systematic change, and I won't be holding my breath.
Good to see the Christmas spirit is alive and well in Russia...perhaps too much spirit?
It's also worth remembering that a high proportion of Russian IT professionals have left for other countries as their skills are easily transferable. In addition Russia has used their skills offensively for a number of years, giving other countries time to learn their ways, yet have not been on the receiving end of such activities until now. Defending against cyber attacks takes skill, time, money (in both personnel and infrastructure costs) and practice. None of which Russia has in any great amount.So are the Ukrainians, Baltics and the US. The Russians don't have any extraordinary expertise here.
The likeliest path to be rid of Putin is another tyrannical regime takes over. That's how Russia got out of the disaster that was the First World War, with the 1917 Revolution seeing the tyrannical Tsar thrown out and replaced by the equally tyrannical Communists, who being more focused on terrorizing their domestic population quickly reached out to the Germans to end their war, on terms quite favourable to Germany.How do you sell systemic change to a people who've been conditioned over the past millennium to exist under one tyrannical regime after another, and haven't a clue how to operate responsibly in a free society? Can tomorrow's strongman be any improvement over today's?
How do you sell systemic change to a people who've been conditioned over the past millennium to exist under one tyrannical regime after another, and haven't a clue how to operate responsibly in a free society? Can tomorrow's strongman be any improvement over today's?
Even the Nobel Peace Prize winners are against a settlement that doesn't have Russia totally out:I think this would be the time to start hashing out some kind of agreement: I figure it would have to allow the Russians to save face and get the Ukranians to refrain from offensive action into Russia since that would force responses and escalate the situation.
Per the below vid, Sweden's wish to join NATO may free up SAAB to offer the Gripen to Ukraine.I think the Gripen would be the better choice. Having the air intake on the bottom of an aircraft operating from rough runways would be a disaster waiting to happen.
I fail to see how one is linked to the other. The video is interesting and I believe the Gripen would be good for Ukraine but I don't see how Sweden's joining NATO has an effect unless one were to argue that they could give up existing aircraft in the short term and have their gap covered by other NATO member. If that were the case, then the same would apply to any other NATO members especially those bringing types such as the F-35 already since that theoretically frees up existing types such as F-16.Sweden's wish to join NATO may free up SAAB to offer the Gripen to Ukraine.
AIUI, Sweden's strict neutrality has precluded it in some cases from offering combat aircraft. But with Sweden a NATO applicant and now providing Ukraine with other weapon systems, any political barriers within Sweden to Gripen exports should be moot.I believe the Gripen would be good for Ukraine but I don't see how Sweden's joint NATO has an effect
Quite a few natiins operate the Gripen.
I suspect that it's more of a nation's needs and interoperability than poor salesmanship.
The article made some good points though. For example, when a national government buys the Rafale or F-16, they're buying it with the participation of the French or US government, not solely from Dassault or Lockheed. But when a government buys a Gripen, they must deal directly with SAAB, with limited to no participation of the Swedish government. Per the article, governments prefer to buy weapons with the participation of the supplier's governments, rather than working through the intricacies of a foreign manufacturing firm's purchasing department.I suspect that it's more of a nation's needs and interoperability than poor salesmanship.
They're taking their sweet time about it.Slovakia ready to transfer MiG-29 to UAF. And a bunch of other stories: