Thumpalumpacus
Major
They're pretty high up. I've heard you can see Siberia from the basement in the Kremlin.
... for 3.3 seconds ...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
They're pretty high up. I've heard you can see Siberia from the basement in the Kremlin.
Patriots aside, is there any update to providing Western MBTs or combat aircraft? I expect a lot of that latest money goes to procuring ammunition, maintenance and spares for existing systems like HIMARs and SPGs.
re additional Patriot systems.
Something that is often overlooked is that this war is not a 'conventional' or traditional type of US war. There are a lot of unknowns on all sides.
The US/NATO deployed HIMARS/MLRS to Ukraine slowly at first partly due to the time needed for training, but also partly due to the unknown of whether the systems would survive long enough to be useful (as opposed to "Hey look at that, they fired one load and got taken out by Russian counter-battery or air strike. Hmmm, boy it sure seemed like a good idea".)
The Patriot system is going to have the same potential problems to be dealt with. Even if we are willing to send a large number of systems, the US/NATO higher-ups will want to be sure they will be sustainable/survivable. And that is ignoring the problem of information/intel the Russians will gather on the Patriot system capabilities once it starts being used operationally - in effect the Russians will be able to 'test' the Patriot system to a significant degree and have the chance to develop work-around tactics and possibly sophisticated electronic countermeasures.
We will send more Patriot systems if it proves survivable, effective, and needed - just as with the HIMARS/MLRS.
I have been watching Twitter die and be replaced by Mastodon on other forums but have yet to see a Mastodon post here.
This surprises me seeing that Musk wants Ukraine to give Crimea and the other four territories to the Poo-tin.
Mastodon is becoming so mainstream that even the Washington Post has a new article, A guide to getting started with Twitter alternative Mastodon.
And Time has a very interesting take on Musk at The Clarifying Moment Elon Musk Has Given Us
"Twatwaffle"? Is that a euphemism for "oligarch wannabe"? Odd that he should want to join a species facing extinction. Tallyrand he's not.Musk is a twatwaffle extraordinaire.
"Twatwaffle"? Is that a euphemism for "oligarch wannabe"? Odd that he should want to join a species facing extinction. Tallyrand he's not.
I can imagine. The word's not hard to deconstruct.If I wanted to spell out what a twatwaffle is I'd have to use language I wouldn't use here.
The Washington Post is owned by Bezos. He hates Musk and will print anything to disparage him. I tried Mastodon, but as far as I could see you had to choose areas of interest and assign yourself to different silos. I don't think Mastodon is the threat to Twitter that Bezo Inc. suggests it may be. Always ask why is this being reported, in addition to what.Mastodon is becoming so mainstream that even the Washington Post has a new article, A guide to getting started with Twitter alternative Mastodon.
Musk is a twatwaffle extraordinaire.
You know, previous US policy toward Ukrainian air defense could be encapsulated in the title of Tom Clancy's second novel in the John Patrick Ryan series, Patriot Games. Thank God that's over at last! "Running out the clock", as we've been doing is downright shameful.