"All of Vlad's forces and all of Vlad's men, are out to put Humpty together again."

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Natural Gas prices in the EU (Amsterdam) continue to drop to almost levels before Russia invasion.

Screenshot 2022-12-23 at 16-44-57 EU Natural Gas - 2022 Data - 2010-2021 Historical - 2023 For...png
 
Text of article:

Zelensky Recalled Us to Ourselves
He came to thank the U.S. for supporting Ukraine. It is Americans who should thank him.
By David Frum
DECEMBER 22, 2022

"So much in the world depends on you."

Of all the many moving words in President Volodymyr Zelensky's speech to a joint meeting of the U.S. Congress, those eight may have been the most urgent and important.

Zelensky came to Washington to speak for his nation. He came to Washington to ask for assistance. But above all, he came to Washington to recall Americans to themselves. He came to say, My embattled people believe in you. Embedded in his words of trust was a challenge: If we believe in you, perhaps you can again believe in yourselves?

Political scientists have dubbed the past 20 years an age of "democratic recession." There are fewer democracies on the planet. Antidemocratic predators have gained in wealth and strength. Even within the surviving democracies, extremist forces have undermined citizens' confidence in their own system of government.

The ideal of partnership among democracies has declined, too, and perhaps even more than confidence within individual democracies. Narrow and selfish nationalism has displaced international cooperation and collective security. The slogan "America First"—seemingly discredited forever along with its fascism-friendly promoters of the late 1930s and early '40s—was revived. Unsurprisingly, "America First" summoned forth reciprocal chauvinism from countries on the receiving end of American tariffs and American disrespect.

This mood of democratic recession enabled Russian President Vladimir Putin's aggression against Ukraine. He regarded Ukraine as weak and vulnerable, and Ukraine's allies as divided and ineffectual. When he ordered the invasion 10 months ago, Putin apparently expected to roll into Kyiv in days. He seemingly expected the rest of the world to grumble, then come to terms. Russian energy, Russian cash—those were, in Putin's mind, the hard realities. Everything else seemed to him just so much vapor.
What a mistake.

The Ukrainians fought. Their ferocious and successful resistance surprised Putin. Perhaps it surprised the Ukrainians themselves. Certainly, it surprised the rest of the world, democratic and nondemocratic alike. A surge of sympathy rapidly translated into the greatest joint military assistance effort since 1945. Weapons, money, intelligence, economic support, humanitarian assistance—all flowed into Ukraine, by the tens of billions of dollars, pounds, and euros. Collective security was suddenly upgraded from an antique slogan to an organizing principle.

The assistance worked. The invasion was stopped, then reversed. The intended victim began to win.

And as the Ukrainians began to win, all the rest of us—all the other intended victims of Putin's aggression—began to consider that maybe we might not be such losers ourselves. Maybe our ideals were not so out-of-date. Maybe our institutions were not so broken. Maybe the people the Ukrainians needed us to be, maybe those were the people we could be again.

Zelensky spoke of "bicameral and bipartisan" support in Congress for his cause. That sounded a surprising note, because an important faction in Congress and in conservative media has aligned with Putin against Ukraine. But Zelensky was using words not to describe reality; he was using words to change reality. His praise strengthened Republican friends of Ukraine such as Senator Mitch McConnell—and the reverberating applause for his praise left the friends of Putin in Congress and in conservative media more aware than ever of their ideological extremism and political isolation.

Zelensky argued that assistance to Ukraine is not charity. It is an investment. That statement is obviously true by the material metrics of national security. At a comparatively small cost in American and allied assistance, the Russian military has been given a mauling it will not soon care to repeat. Ukraine's resistance has helped secure Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan, too, because the lesson inflicted on Moscow will surely reverberate in Beijing.

But the "investment, not charity" argument is even more powerful when measured less materially. What the Western world is getting in return for its aid is a powerful recommitment to its own best self. We didn't believe the Ukrainians could do it, in part because we didn't believe we could do it. But they did. And so did we. And we look now at both Ukraine and ourselves in new ways.

The extremists and conspiracists and populists, the authoritarians and kleptocrats and theocrats who have all gained so much ascendancy in recent years, they do not speak for us. That small man in the olive-green jersey at the rostrum of the House of Representatives, he spoke for us. And the reception given to him today by the president and by Congress told the world that his words had been heard and received and understood by the great democracy-minded majority of Americans.
"So much in the world depends on you." Sometimes, Americans forget that.

Zelensky reminded us. He came to say thank you. It's a little embarrassing to hear that thanks, because what Americans gave, fundamentally, was just money. Zelensky's people have given blood, home, comfort, and security—every precious thing that human beings can sacrifice. The answer we owe Zelensky, the answer Zelensky should hear from this country, revived by his visit, his cause, and his country's heroic fight, is: No, no, no—thank you.

David Frum is a staff writer at The Atlantic.
 
The Ukraine has a long history of corruption, including spending major money to influence American politicians. While we must support them militarily, that doesn't mean that we should simply shovel money at the problem. We should be certain that we're supporting the military without seeing too much siphoned off for other interests. If we send American weapons, are we funding replenishment of our own military.
Zelensky has specifically tried to crack down on corruption...even when pressured personally to do corrupt favours for some. It is also certainly not a case of just shovelling money. Most support is in the form of real hardware being used daily. And actions are already underway to replenish. It should also be considered an investment to prevent future larger, more costly actions.
Second, some of those crying most loudly are the same folks who sent blankets when the Russians stole Crimea.
Two wrongs don't make a right - hence doing what is being done now is helping correct something that should have been done in 2014.
Why would the Russians have expected anything different from us when those same folks returned to power in this country.
Well, I am sure they would have had a better result if things had gone a different way a couple of years ago:

trump-Sergey-Lavrov-Sergei-Kislyak.jpg
 
The Kusnetsov is over 30 years old. The innards have been maintained by the Soviet and then Russian navies. Its best use would be either an artificial reef or prison hulk.
The Kiev class carriers that India and China purchased from Russia were older.

Both nations gutted the hulls and refitted the carriers to the point that they are virtually new ships.

Nothing wrong with Kuznetsov's hull - just needs new innards (and someone else besides Russia to keep it in working order).
 
China is building their carriers from scratch now, I doubt they will bid on this fiery/smokey/rusty old carrier.

So is India, for that matter.

The Kiev class carriers that India and China purchased from Russia were older.

Both nations gutted the hulls and refitted the carriers to the point that they are virtually new ships.

Nothing wrong with Kuznetsov's hull - just needs new innards (and someone else besides Russia to keep it in working order).

I doubt India will buy any more Russian ships. The last carrier they bought went well over budget from $1.8B to $2.5B because the ship was in such a poor state. The story of the sale, refurb, and transfer as reported by Wiki (yes, I know) has probably soured India on doing business with Russia in second-hand ships.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back