Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Not if your opponent is operating old tech T-64s, T-72s and T-80s. It's all relative.This latest Orc wunderwaffe is just as vulnerable and useless as other Orc tanks
This demonstrates the importance of having your own military tech and production. If ever the RAF is all F-35s, Washington will direct British foreign policy on such matters. Hopefully we see the Tempest step in.
Not if your opponent is operating old tech T-64s, T-72s and T-80s. It's all relative.
Yes, agreed. But you were referring specifically to the "latest Orc wunderwaffe", the T-90M Proryv. Do you consider all Russian-origin tanks to have the same abilities because they share a gun calibre? I would argue you need to consider the situational awareness, communications, target acquisition and fire control systems, in addition to any advances in protection and mobility, not solely the pointy bit at the front.When everyones got the same 125mm gun, its he who shoots first wins the gunfight. The Orcs can call it a 'T-90', but its just a warmed over T-72 at heart, and the Orcs are fielding ancient T-62's in increasing numbers.
C-5As need friendly airfields at both ends. For river crossings, boats and mexiflotes make much more sense than C-5s. Internally, rail lines and tank transportersJust wondering about the Leopard I. It seems to be much lighter than the other tanks so would it be useful in a Dnipro river crossing? I have no idea what "sea lift" capacity Ukraine might have. Maybe they could borrow some C-5As?
When the Leopard 2's turn up, grab the beer and put it out.Another joke crashes and burns.