Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Crimea,Does anyone have a good explanation of how the Russian Su-27 "clipped the propeller" of that drone without touching the rest of it?
That is pretty well known and I 'm not saying that.Oh, come on! The Moors haven't invaded in over 1000 years. Relax.
The Su-27 was damaged in the wingtip?Yeah I get that. I am wondering how the US statement of the aircraft "clipping the propeller" if a pusher aircraft really went down. If contact was made, how do you just clip the propeller without wiping out the rest of the drone and severely damaging your own aircraft?
Strictly speaking they actually did .... in 2002Oh, come on! The Moors haven't invaded in over 1000 years. Relax.
Remember Perengil Island!
Not that "catchy" a phrase.
It will be a bomb if presented tobthe Eurovisión song contest.Ok....I'm going to apologise profusely for this. But I'm doing it anyway....
Somehow, we managed to miss the anniversary on 1 March of the release of the "Bayraktar" song....so here's a remix I found which made me laugh (although it's probably been posted here before and I just missed it. Nothing new there...most things go over my head). Still love the Ukrainians' sense of humour:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRACuuy4AHo
And for those bluff old traditionalists, here's the original release in all its glory:
View: https://twitter.com/jenmarie410/status/1498874621541691397?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1498874621541691397%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=
Happy ear worm!!!!!
Boy do i hate that jukky show of just sweety rotting nothingness.but i vote for this one.Eurovisión song contest.
BTW, thiswarspecial military operation wasn't, supposedly, against NATO, the US and the west, which are actively in combat? I'm missing something?
I think that's his point. It's why Putin's lackey got laughed at when he claimed that Russia was a victim of aggression.There are no NATO, US or western military units in action against the Russians - they are just providing support to the Ukrainians just like the Iranians, Chinese etc are to the Russians
Perhaps a misjudged approach from the beam, clipping the Reaper's prop with the Su-27's wingtip? Seems implausible to me given the other descriptions of the engagement...but that's about the only way I could see the Reaper prop being clipped and not the rest of the airframe.
It's time to arm those drones.Or they have hard points under the wing. I do not know what they carry on them but that payload may clip the prop without touching the tail though that would take a lot of skill if deliberate though more likely they were trying to hit the tail or just create severe turbulence to cause it to go out of control. Lets hope they release the presumed video
I'm still willing to bet that the Su-27 damaged either of the vertical stabilizers when it struck the Reaper's prop.
Yes, that is well known everywhere except inside Rusia.There are no NATO, US or western military units in action against the Russians - they are just providing support to the Ukrainians just like the Iranians, Chinese etc are to the Russians